Ask the Scholar

Page 4 of 6
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 4

OCR

WAR DADS SLAP TRUMAN WAR DADS SLAP TRUMAN SENATOR DRAWS FIRE ON STATE- MENT ABOUT DE SOTO PLANT. (Continued from First Page.) , themselves and for you, too, Mr Senator. Sunflower Construction Workers DID NOT VISIT PLANT. Demand Retraction or Clarifi- cation of Accusations Made y "Your statement quoted above was A PLANT IN A YEAR. in Probe of Alleged Waste. predicated as was proved, on the re- "In any case, Mr. Senator, these marks passed on to you by just a few disgruntled employees whose in- men are no less patriotic for having terests were purely personal done this job well. Certainly the Senator Harry S. Truman's charges evidence for an 'informer's' suit, as have not 'shot soldiers in the back of irregularities in the construction S it were. Why the very word reeks and the government has acquired i of the Sunflower Ordnance works with stench, filth and the grime for one short year's time, an immens at De Soto, Kas., caused a spirited which it stands. You did not visit plant of high productive capacit: the plant you SO vigorously criticized. strategically located in the heart ( protest yesterday from the American S Your knowledge of this plant is lim- the continent, and which is alread War Dads chapter at the plant. A ited only to what has been told to in production of essential war ma- resolution adopted at a meeting of you by other people, the wrong terials. It will make a direct and the War Dads, which has as mem- people. important contribution in the task bers 1,240 of the project workers, "You did not bother to call upon which is paramount in the natior demands that Senator Truman clar- nor listen to any of the thousands at. this hour-the winning of this ify his statements or retract them. of other men and women who la- war. 3 It points out that speed was the bored so diligently with every meas- We, the American War Dads, feel first goal in the construction. ure of their ability to complete this that the statement expressed by you - plant ahead of schedule in order has affected, in fact jeopardized A DRIVE AGAINST LOAFING. that our forces over there may have each and every one of us, in addition The organization of the chapter at this particular powder before it was to the many thousands of other loyal the ordnance plant began in Feb- L too late. Thank God, we did not workers who still remain to complete ruary. One of its early activities fail them. the job. They are true Americans, was a drive against loafers on the "This plant was put in operation all of them. They are buying bonds, job. The War Dads wore on the fully three months ahead of sched- conserving critical materials and in job the khaki overseas cap that is ule. And, instead of production of every way trying to further the war the club's official headgear. only 24,000 units as stated by you effort. With thorough justification, Carl P. Werner, secretary, said and which you allowed to be pub- therefore, we ask it in the name of that sometimes fists were required lished, production as it is revealed all that is holy and righteous, that during the campaign, and the War in the hearing records was 400,000 you clarify your statement more Dads used them with a right good unts. This is a ratio of better than fully or retract it entirely by use of will. Werner declared that army 16 to 1, which is about the ratio the same channels through which it and plant officials had commended shown by you when voicing facts was established, the American the club for its drive and credited versus opinion, your opinions. press." the organization with increasing the NO REBUTTAL IS MADE. construction work efficiency by 15 per cent. "It is not intended herein to offer The resolution, addressed to Tru- any statements of rebuttal to the 1 man, began: claims made by you, your associates "We, the fathers of sons and 1 or those who spoke derogatorily of daughters in the armed service of 1 this project. Such a burden is not our country, who aided with the con- for these shoulders, but will, WE a struction of the Sunflower Ordnance hope, be taken up and carried by S works at De Soto, Kas., do hereby those selected for the task. If the openly resent the statement made by b committee of inquiry, so called, of you, which appeared in the public e: which you are a member, conclude: press and we quote, "There has been that waste was apparent in the con some shooting of the soldiers in the struction of this project, keep il back, in the construction of the Sun- mind his one prime factor, that is C2 flower Ordnance plant.' This is the speed is all essential in a time of 0 statement, your statement, which war. This war especially 1 screamed forth in banner headlines Prevalent in this as in the case of E in the issue of June 10 of The Kan- all war time construction was the f e sas City Star." factor of time. Starting with the \ The resolution continued, saying bare site, army supervisors, con- S 1 that "this body of Americans, who tractors, and we the workers, set 1 are Americans to the last ounce of forth fro mthe very beginning with ] 1 blood within their veins, do hereby only one idea in mind, that of get- - declare your statement as above ting a munitions plant into opera- quoted, to be wholly unfounded, un- tion in the shortest possible time. It warranted and certainly to be the was generally conceded, and right- least deserved by these men who fully so, that costs, therefore, would actually did the work. the definitely be in excess of those of building of Sunflower Ordnance normal times. In such a setting, works. Yes, this and many other just what constitutes reclaimable I war projects, all of which are now waste material and how much time in production, were constructed with should be sacrificed to reclaim it, the aid of these men in order that are moot points on which complete their very own children across seas agreement never could be reached. may have the arms, the ammunition Where some see inexcusable waste, 1 and the equipment with which to others will see a justifiable sacrifice 1 win through to victory. for for speed. (Continued on Second Page.)

Page data

Page
4
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
5bc9f169afdfe34d
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
470541232
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "470541232",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232",
    "collections": [
        "Bess W. Truman Papers",
        "Family Correspondence Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Truman, Harry Arnold, 1923-",
        "Truman, J. Vivian (John Vivian), 1886-1965",
        "Klemm, Karl D., 1880-",
        "Truman, Fred L., 1915-1997",
        "Swoyer, Martha Ann, 1919-2008"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "470541232",
    "label": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "470541232",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232",
    "collections": [
        "Bess W. Truman Papers",
        "Family Correspondence Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Truman, Harry Arnold, 1923-",
        "Truman, J. Vivian (John Vivian), 1886-1965",
        "Klemm, Karl D., 1880-",
        "Truman, Fred L., 1915-1997",
        "Swoyer, Martha Ann, 1919-2008"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470541232",
    "naId": 470541232,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 17,
            "logicalDate": "1943-06-17",
            "month": 6,
            "year": 1943
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 4,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283359/6283359-06-004.tif",
    "mediaId": "5bc9f169afdfe34d",
    "ocrText": "WAR DADS SLAP TRUMAN\nWAR DADS SLAP TRUMAN\nSENATOR DRAWS FIRE ON STATE-\nMENT ABOUT DE SOTO PLANT.\n(Continued from First Page.)\n,\nthemselves and for you, too, Mr\nSenator.\nSunflower Construction Workers\nDID NOT VISIT PLANT.\nDemand Retraction or Clarifi-\ncation of Accusations Made\ny\n\"Your statement quoted above was\nA PLANT IN A YEAR.\nin Probe of Alleged Waste.\npredicated as was proved, on the re-\n\"In any case, Mr. Senator, these\nmarks passed on to you by just a\nfew disgruntled employees whose in-\nmen are no less patriotic for having\nterests were purely personal\ndone this job well. Certainly the\nSenator Harry S. Truman's charges\nevidence for an 'informer's' suit, as\nhave not 'shot soldiers in the back\nof irregularities in the construction\nS\nit were. Why the very word reeks\nand the government has acquired i\nof the Sunflower Ordnance works\nwith stench, filth and the grime for\none short year's time, an immens\nat De Soto, Kas., caused a spirited\nwhich it stands. You did not visit\nplant of high productive capacit:\nthe plant you SO vigorously criticized.\nstrategically located in the heart (\nprotest yesterday from the American\nS\nYour knowledge of this plant is lim-\nthe continent, and which is alread\nWar Dads chapter at the plant. A\nited only to what has been told to\nin production of essential war ma-\nresolution adopted at a meeting of\nyou by other people, the wrong\nterials. It will make a direct and\nthe War Dads, which has as mem-\npeople.\nimportant contribution in the task\nbers 1,240 of the project workers,\n\"You did not bother to call upon\nwhich is paramount in the natior\ndemands that Senator Truman clar-\nnor listen to any of the thousands\nat. this hour-the winning of this\nify his statements or retract them.\nof other men and women who la-\nwar.\n3\nIt points out that speed was the\nbored so diligently with every meas-\nWe, the American War Dads, feel\nfirst goal in the construction.\nure of their ability to complete this\nthat the statement expressed by you\n-\nplant ahead of schedule in order\nhas affected, in fact jeopardized\nA DRIVE AGAINST LOAFING.\nthat our forces over there may have\neach and every one of us, in addition\nThe organization of the chapter at\nthis particular powder before it was\nto the many thousands of other loyal\nthe ordnance plant began in Feb-\nL\ntoo late. Thank God, we did not\nworkers who still remain to complete\nruary. One of its early activities\nfail them.\nthe job. They are true Americans,\nwas a drive against loafers on the\n\"This plant was put in operation\nall of them. They are buying bonds,\njob. The War Dads wore on the\nfully three months ahead of sched-\nconserving critical materials and in\njob the khaki overseas cap that is\nule. And, instead of production of\nevery way trying to further the war\nthe club's official headgear.\nonly 24,000 units as stated by you\neffort. With thorough justification,\nCarl P. Werner, secretary, said\nand which you allowed to be pub-\ntherefore, we ask it in the name of\nthat sometimes fists were required\nlished, production as it is revealed\nall that is holy and righteous, that\nduring the campaign, and the War\nin the hearing records was 400,000\nyou clarify your statement more\nDads used them with a right good\nunts. This is a ratio of better than\nfully or retract it entirely by use of\nwill. Werner declared that army\n16 to 1, which is about the ratio\nthe same channels through which it\nand plant officials had commended\nshown by you when voicing facts\nwas established, the American\nthe club for its drive and credited\nversus opinion, your opinions.\npress.\"\nthe organization with increasing the\nNO REBUTTAL IS MADE.\nconstruction work efficiency by 15\nper cent.\n\"It is not intended herein to offer\nThe resolution, addressed to Tru-\nany statements of rebuttal to the\n1\nman, began:\nclaims made by you, your associates\n\"We, the fathers of sons and\n1\nor those who spoke derogatorily of\ndaughters in the armed service of\n1\nthis project. Such a burden is not\nour country, who aided with the con-\nfor these shoulders, but will, WE\na\nstruction of the Sunflower Ordnance\nhope, be taken up and carried by\nS\nworks at De Soto, Kas., do hereby\nthose selected for the task. If the\nopenly resent the statement made by\nb\ncommittee of inquiry, so called, of\nyou, which appeared in the public\ne:\nwhich you are a member, conclude:\npress and we quote, \"There has been\nthat waste was apparent in the con\nsome shooting of the soldiers in the\nstruction of this project, keep il\nback, in the construction of the Sun-\nmind his one prime factor, that is\nC2\nflower Ordnance plant.' This is the\nspeed is all essential in a time of\n0\nstatement, your statement, which\nwar. This war especially\n1\nscreamed forth in banner headlines\nPrevalent in this as in the case of\nE\nin the issue of June 10 of The Kan-\nall war time construction was the\nf\ne\nsas City Star.\"\nfactor of time. Starting with the\n\\\nThe resolution continued, saying\nbare site, army supervisors, con-\nS\n1\nthat \"this body of Americans, who\ntractors, and we the workers, set\n1\nare Americans to the last ounce of\nforth fro mthe very beginning with\n]\n1\nblood within their veins, do hereby\nonly one idea in mind, that of get-\n-\ndeclare your statement as above\nting a munitions plant into opera-\nquoted, to be wholly unfounded, un-\ntion in the shortest possible time. It\nwarranted and certainly to be the\nwas generally conceded, and right-\nleast deserved by these men who\nfully so, that costs, therefore, would\nactually did the work.\nthe\ndefinitely be in excess of those of\nbuilding of Sunflower Ordnance\nnormal times. In such a setting,\nworks. Yes, this and many other\njust what constitutes reclaimable\nI\nwar projects, all of which are now\nwaste material and how much time\nin production, were constructed with\nshould be sacrificed to reclaim it,\nthe aid of these men in order that\nare moot points on which complete\ntheir very own children across seas\nagreement never could be reached.\nmay have the arms, the ammunition\nWhere some see inexcusable waste,\n1\nand the equipment with which to\nothers will see a justifiable sacrifice\n1\nwin through to victory.\nfor\nfor speed.\n(Continued on Second Page.)"
}