Ask the Scholar
Page 21 of 37
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
THUMANA
REEL 3 que 7/22/53 - Page 2( (KR)
Es ARCHIVEN & "NATIONAL RECORDS ADMIN'
MR. JESSUPE
to do. I don it know abaut this.
COVERANCE
VOICE:
This question of objectivity is taking an awful beating in political
channels anyhow, Mac; I am not sure that at t he time if the pot had
really boiled, and you could have come out with the White Paper, that
it wouldn it have been under
VOICE:
Dipping down into the wor st collection of attitudes, it wouldn it have
been "defensive" and argumentive, and that that would have been the
answer.
about
VOICE:
W 11, doesn't think accomplish quite a bit, as it is supposed to?
e
MR. BUNDY:
Well it was very helpful to those who wished to be helped. I mean
people in any academic work, who believed a lot of this, and hadn't
had do cument S to indivate the (various scores). . It was a instrument
of understanding and late of argument. The first year I used it teaching
the re wasn't any argument, W hich is an int eresting fact.
VOICE:
As a sample of the lack of a political follow=up that I was talking
about within a. few months after the appe arance of this in the spring
of *50, I made a short speech on China, which in its principal policy
points, it is very close to the principal policy points stated in the
Spcretary's letter of transmittal, even such things as hoping t hat the
Chinese would do something about, we should do everything we could to
Page data
- Page
- 21
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 8374c3533fb2b6c9
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75850166
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75850166",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 37,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75850166",
"label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75850166",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminar Discussion, Reel 3",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166",
"collections": [
"Dean Acheson Papers",
"Princeton Seminars Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 37,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850166",
"naId": 75850166,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 22,
"logicalDate": "1953-07-22",
"month": 7,
"year": 1953
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 21,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722159-03-21.jpg",
"mediaId": "8374c3533fb2b6c9",
"ocrText": "THUMANA\nREEL 3 que 7/22/53 - Page 2( (KR)\nEs ARCHIVEN & \"NATIONAL RECORDS ADMIN'\nMR. JESSUPE\nto do. I don it know abaut this.\nCOVERANCE\nVOICE:\nThis question of objectivity is taking an awful beating in political\nchannels anyhow, Mac; I am not sure that at t he time if the pot had\nreally boiled, and you could have come out with the White Paper, that\nit wouldn it have been under\nVOICE:\nDipping down into the wor st collection of attitudes, it wouldn it have\nbeen \"defensive\" and argumentive, and that that would have been the\nanswer.\nabout\nVOICE:\nW 11, doesn't think accomplish quite a bit, as it is supposed to?\ne\nMR. BUNDY:\nWell it was very helpful to those who wished to be helped. I mean\npeople in any academic work, who believed a lot of this, and hadn't\nhad do cument S to indivate the (various scores). . It was a instrument\nof understanding and late of argument. The first year I used it teaching\nthe re wasn't any argument, W hich is an int eresting fact.\nVOICE:\nAs a sample of the lack of a political follow=up that I was talking\nabout within a. few months after the appe arance of this in the spring\nof *50, I made a short speech on China, which in its principal policy\npoints, it is very close to the principal policy points stated in the\nSpcretary's letter of transmittal, even such things as hoping t hat the\nChinese would do something about, we should do everything we could to"
}