Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 17
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

10/10/53 - Reel 2, track 2 - Page 2 MR. ACHESON: the and the DR. I would like to ask one question about a rather special problem which seems to de to have been a failure for reasons that are not clear, but it could vell be after Paul talis. Let me say what it is, and if he vants to touch it, he may. I think it was in the vinter of 148 - a .49. above all in the spring of 14 and the summer of '49, that an effort was made to bring the United States and the United Kingdom together on their atomic and military. TRUMAN VOICN: Oh, yes, that' Letters s ARCHIVES,& "NATIONAL RECORDS ADMIN , DR. This should have happened; it clearly should have happened. It started here, I think, in this place. It didn't happen, and I thought that maybe an inquiry into the dauses of this failure would not be uninteresting, Now, that may be unrelated. MR. ACHESOM: That's a very complicated thing. DR. OPPENHEINOR: I know - I think I Jnow about nine of the ten points, but the tenth I don't. Maybe it's urrolated to the question you want to discuss. I think the equivocal position taken by the Defense Department is related to the failure of this, but I am not sure. MR. NITZM: I don't believe I can contribute to this particular problem, because this was one that was wholly in George's hands, and I didn't par- ticipate in this particular one except by the by. One point I did want to make, and that is that Loui S Johnson did have a point, really, and that vas that, as far as we were concerned in the State Department, at lower levels then the Secretary, we were not at all interested in the views that the Secretary of State - the Secretary of Defense or his assistants, really. What we vere

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
5c1a5c319030d3f2
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75850569
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75850569",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminars Discussion, Reel 2, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 17,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75850569",
    "label": "Transcript of Princeton Seminars Discussion, Reel 2, Track 2",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75850569",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Transcript of Princeton Seminars Discussion, Reel 2, Track 2",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569",
    "collections": [
        "Dean Acheson Papers",
        "Princeton Seminars Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 17,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75850569",
    "naId": 75850569,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 10,
            "logicalDate": "1953-10-10",
            "month": 10,
            "year": 1953
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/653115/1722161-04-02.jpg",
    "mediaId": "5c1a5c319030d3f2",
    "ocrText": "10/10/53 - Reel 2, track 2 - Page 2\nMR. ACHESON: the\nand the\nDR. I would like to ask one question about a rather special problem\nwhich seems to de to have been a failure for reasons that are not\nclear, but it could vell be after Paul talis. Let me say what it\nis, and if he vants to touch it, he may. I think it was in the\nvinter of 148 - a .49. above all in the spring of 14 and the\nsummer of '49, that an effort was made to bring the United States\nand the United Kingdom together on their atomic and military.\nTRUMAN\nVOICN:\nOh, yes, that'\nLetters s ARCHIVES,& \"NATIONAL RECORDS ADMIN ,\nDR. This should have happened; it clearly should have happened.\nIt started here, I think, in this place. It didn't happen, and\nI thought that maybe an inquiry into the dauses of this failure\nwould not be uninteresting, Now, that may be unrelated.\nMR. ACHESOM: That's a very complicated thing.\nDR. OPPENHEINOR: I know - I think I Jnow about nine of the ten points, but the\ntenth I don't. Maybe it's urrolated to the question you want to\ndiscuss. I think the equivocal position taken by the Defense\nDepartment is related to the failure of this, but I am not sure.\nMR. NITZM:\nI don't believe I can contribute to this particular problem, because\nthis was one that was wholly in George's hands, and I didn't par-\nticipate in this particular one except by the by. One point I\ndid want to make, and that is that Loui S Johnson did have a point,\nreally, and that vas that, as far as we were concerned in the\nState Department, at lower levels then the Secretary, we were not\nat all interested in the views that the Secretary of State - the\nSecretary of Defense or his assistants, really. What we vere"
}