Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
295025347
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Mr. Springers
UNCLASSIFIED
11/12/59
PD-
Date
Initial
December 3, 1949
EMORANDUM FOR THE FILES:
SUBJECT: Overseas Investment in Point IV:
I gather that the State Department has not given much
time to the expansion of overseas investment under the Point IV
program, and in fact, is deferring it as a major effort, because
they are now in the process of undertaking a gigantic drive to
increase imports into this country. Apparently, the policy decision
has been made to launch a tremendous drive of publicity, apeeches
and activity on the Hill in the direction of increasing imports.
This goes beyond the program for reducing tariffs and removing
customs barriers, etc. The Department realizes that this is a.
tremendous undertaking and means virtually a shift in Ameri gan
thinking about foreign trade.
Under-playing the role of foreign investment also
results from the difficulties encountered or anticipated in this
field, and the further belief that technical assistance is in
many areas a necessary first step before much investment can be
undertaken.
I believe that these currents in State Department
thinking account for the comparatively negligible role which
overseas investment currently has in their Point IV planning.
This comparative neglect of the investment feature of
Point IV seems to me a mistake for several reasons. While we can
be most syapathetic toward the efforts to increase imports, it is
certain to be a slow and laborious process, and quite unlikely to
close the dollar gap in the foreseeable future. Secondly, an
increase in investments is also a slow process and requires a
great deal of agitating and prodding before good investments can
be made. The danger is that we vd.ll coast into 1953 and later not only
without any appreciable increase in overseas investment, but also
without the mechanism and preliminary groundwork necessary for such
an increase. We should certainly ask, for example, for an increase
in the Ex-Im Bank's authorization for the fiscal year '52. Unless
the Ex-Im Bank does more foreign lending than it has done or is now
doing, we will not be in a position to justify such a request with
the emphasis that is required.