Memorandum, Notes on Meeting of Dr. Steelman, Mr. Fairless and Mr. Murray
Images (4)
Document
| id |
id
122659745
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4Meeting of Dr. Steelman, Mr. Fairless and Mr. Murray
The meeting started about 3:15 and continued until 5. Mr. Murray
and Mr. Fairless spoke very highly of each other. Fairless sai d he wished
every worker in the steel companies belonged to Murray's union, and Murray
expressed a warm, friendly feeling toward Mr. Fairless personally.
Dr. Steelman told them the reason he asked them to come together was
that he feared a misunderstanding if he acted as intermediary in getting an
answer to the question which the company operators posed -- namely, does
Mr. Murray consider the WSB recommendations as if they were a binding
arbitrary award or is he willing to use them as a general bases for
negotiations of a settlement? Steelman said the answer to that type of
question is very likely to be misunderstood and, therefore, he wanted the
two men to discuss that question directly with each other.
Mr. Fairless made it clear that he was willing to talk in a general
way with Mr. Murray but that he was not willing to be bound by what he said.
He was not negotiating at all. Mr. Murray said he wasn't negotiating
either, - just canvassing the possibility of getting down to negotiations.
On that basis they talked about the whole problem. Each agreed he
wouldn't report back everything said, but in order to clarify what each
meant by the use of the Board's recommendations as a basis for settlement
it was inevitable that they would discuss issues. They discussed the money
terms of the contract, retroactivity, paid holidays, Sunday premium pay,
differentials, and union shop.
The difficulty presented to the companies by the step-up of wages
in July of 1952 and January 1953 was pointed out clearly by Mr. Fairless.
Terms
Subject
Labor disputes
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to