Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 11
THE HUMANITIES AND THE LAW* The education of the young is an urgent problem in our unsettled time. Imparting the knowledge and the skills essential to a thoughtful, productive life has been a hard task in any age. But in this day when the pace of living and the range of knowledge have increased so swiftly, the job is most difficult. Yet it must be done. For in a society in which each is privileged to play a part in the determination of public policy, ignorance is a threat to the welfare of all. It is fitting and timely, therefore, that the members of one of the learned professions should here consider the values of general education to those who wish to enter the legal profession. General education may be defined as that type of education which introduces the young to the common life of their time and their kind. Hence it includes that fund of knowledge and beliefs and those habits of language and thought which form the distinguishing features of our society. It is the unifying element in our culture. It is the repository of our common experience--moral, scientific, aesthetic, spiritual--ignorance of which leaves men incapable of understanding themselves and the world in which they live. General education should prepare the individual for a full and satisfying life as a member of a family, as a citizen, and as an integrated and purposeful human being. If the citizen of today is to understand the nature of man and of the world in which he lives, he must have at least an elementary knowledge of the various branches of learning that we are discussing on this occasion--the social sciences, the physical sciences, and the humanities. For each of these disciplines embraces its own peculiar body of knowledge, and its own variations in method. No one has made this point more forcefully than Mr. Justice Story, when in his inaugural address as Professor of Law at Harvard he said: "Many of our most illustrious statesmen have been lawyers, but they have been lawyers liberalized by philosophy, and a large intercourse with the wisdom of ancient and modern times. The perfect lawyer, like the perfect orator, must accomplish himself for his duties by familiarity with every study. It may be truly said, that to him nothing, that concerns human nature or human art, is indifferent or useless. It is desirable, therefore, that as a student he should work in each of the broad areas of knowledge in order that he may be versed in the subject matter of each field and skilled in its methods. The facts he learns may be outmoded or forgotten, but if he remembers the sources of knowledge and retains the skills of acquiring it, he can approach new problems intelligently as they arise. In advocating that lawyers pursue courses in the major branches of knowledge I do not wish to endorse a set of specific requirements. The policy of the profession of allowing students to select their own prelegal *By Earl James McGrath, U. S. Commissioner of Education, Federal Security Agency, Washington, D. C., at the dedication ceremonies of the new Law Center of New York University, at the morning session, Sept. 15, 1951. ADVANCE COPY. NOT FOR RELEASE BEFORE SATURDAY P.M. 's. Published in New York University Law Review, Volume 27, Number 1, January 1952. pp. 49-62.