Ask the Scholar

Page 175 of 200
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 175

OCR

Communist disregard for the rights of the individual was clearly revealed in the heated debates on voluntary repatriation. The inhuman practices of the Communists had made thousand of captured Communist soldiers unwilling to return to their former masters. The Communists insisted that every one of these men had to be forcibly returned to their control. They declared no progress would be made until the United Nations Command agree to become a partner in forcing prisoners of war back into the hands of the Communists. When Communist inspired riots broke out in the civilian internee camps and prisoner of war camps of the United Nations Command, the Communists angrily protested. The United Nations Command staff officers tried to exchange the data desired by the Communists on the 44,000 names furnished the United Nations Command for the promised data on all prisoners of war, some 65,000 prisoners, ever held by the Communists. The Communists had promised to make the exchange in the 29 December 1951 and 1 January 1952 discussions. They had said on 1 January that the data on all prisoners of war captured by them during the hostilities was ready for exchange. Now, however, the Communist staff officers hedged on their promise. The Sub-Committee on agenda item 4 resumed discussions on 29 February at the suggestion of the United Nations Command Staff Officers. Thanks to a definition of repatriation for the purposes of the armistice supplied by the United Nations Command, the Sub- Committees were able to ratify six paragraphs of the draft agree- ment: (3) Return of seriously sick and seriously injured prisoners of war; (5) Place of delivery of prisoners of war; (6) Committee for repatriation of prisoners of war; (7) Organization and functions of joint Red Cross teams; (8) Exchange of data on escaped and deceased prisoners of war; and (9) Displaced civilians. Yet to be solved was the issue of forced or voluntary repatriation; the final solution of three paragraphs depended on the outcome of the debate. While the Communists continued to say that no agree- ment on agenda item 4 was possible unless the United Nations Com- mand knuckled under to the Communist demand for forced repatria- tion, the United Nations Command Sub-Delegation declared: "There shall be no forced repatriation, the United Nations Command Sub- Delegation declared: "There shall be no forced repatriation". DA IN 132825 (28 Apr 52) - 976 -

Page data

Page
175
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
e5f16d9864171490
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
1702329
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "1702329",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Pertinent Papers on Korean Situation: Volume V [1952:  pp. 803 - 1000]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329",
    "collections": [
        "Korean War Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Department of Defense Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Korean War, 1950-1953"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 200,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "1702329",
    "label": "Pertinent Papers on Korean Situation: Volume V [1952:  pp. 803 - 1000]",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "1702329",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Pertinent Papers on Korean Situation: Volume V [1952:  pp. 803 - 1000]",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329",
    "collections": [
        "Korean War Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Department of Defense Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Korean War, 1950-1953"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 200,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1702329",
    "naId": 1702329,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 175,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-kwf/599764/1702329/1702329-01-175.tif",
    "mediaId": "e5f16d9864171490",
    "ocrText": "Communist disregard for the rights of the individual was\nclearly revealed in the heated debates on voluntary repatriation.\nThe inhuman practices of the Communists had made thousand of\ncaptured Communist soldiers unwilling to return to their former\nmasters. The Communists insisted that every one of these men had\nto be forcibly returned to their control. They declared no progress\nwould be made until the United Nations Command agree to become a\npartner in forcing prisoners of war back into the hands of the\nCommunists. When Communist inspired riots broke out in the\ncivilian internee camps and prisoner of war camps of the United\nNations Command, the Communists angrily protested.\nThe United Nations Command staff officers tried to exchange\nthe data desired by the Communists on the 44,000 names furnished\nthe United Nations Command for the promised data on all prisoners\nof war, some 65,000 prisoners, ever held by the Communists. The\nCommunists had promised to make the exchange in the 29 December\n1951 and 1 January 1952 discussions. They had said on 1 January\nthat the data on all prisoners of war captured by them during the\nhostilities was ready for exchange. Now, however, the Communist\nstaff officers hedged on their promise.\nThe Sub-Committee on agenda item 4 resumed discussions on\n29 February at the suggestion of the United Nations Command Staff\nOfficers. Thanks to a definition of repatriation for the purposes\nof the armistice supplied by the United Nations Command, the Sub-\nCommittees were able to ratify six paragraphs of the draft agree-\nment: (3) Return of seriously sick and seriously injured prisoners\nof war; (5) Place of delivery of prisoners of war; (6) Committee\nfor repatriation of prisoners of war; (7) Organization and\nfunctions of joint Red Cross teams; (8) Exchange of data on\nescaped and deceased prisoners of war; and (9) Displaced civilians.\nYet to be solved was the issue of forced or voluntary repatriation;\nthe final solution of three paragraphs depended on the outcome of\nthe debate. While the Communists continued to say that no agree-\nment on agenda item 4 was possible unless the United Nations Com-\nmand knuckled under to the Communist demand for forced repatria-\ntion, the United Nations Command Sub-Delegation declared: \"There\nshall be no forced repatriation, the United Nations Command Sub-\nDelegation declared: \"There shall be no forced repatriation\".\nDA IN 132825\n(28 Apr 52)\n- 976 -"
}