Memorandum of Conversation with David McNicol, Mr. Tomlinson, and U. Alexis Johnson
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
519784903
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3RE
DECLASSIFIED
SECRIVE DEPARTMENT SECURITY OF INFORMATION STATE
E.O. 13526
Authority NLT 2010-001
9
NARA
PMN
Date
Memorandum of Conversation
DATE: May 3, 1952
SUBJECT: Korean Armistice Negotiations
PARTICIPANTS:
Mr. David McNicol - Australian Embassy
Mr. Tomlinson
- British Embassy
FE - Mr. Johnson
COPIES TO:
FE
G
UNA
EUR
RE
u. s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 16-61120-1
Mr. McNicol telephoned me this morning under instructions of
Ambassador Spender to state that the Australian Government desired
to suggest that consideration be given to proposing that the re-
screening of non-repatriates, by a suitable international agency or
joint Red Cross teams with Communist observation if desired, take
place prior to rather than following an armistice. Mr. McNicol stated
that
the Australian Government did not suggest or believe that such
a proposal should be made at this time but should be considered in
the light of a possible future move which would clearly demonstrate
to world opinion that the UNC had exhausted every possibility of
obtaining agreement with the Communists.
I told Mr. McNicol that prior to adopting our present position
we had given careful consideration to this possibility and rejected
it on the grounds that there is probably no difference in possi-
bilities of acceptance by the Communists and that re-screening prior
to an armistice offered marked tages, which I detailed, to the
UNC over rescreening subsequent to an armistice. I said that it
appeared to us that so far as obtaining an armistice was concerned
the problem resolved around whether the Communists would accept our
basic position on POWs and not around the details of the proposed
rescreening of non-repatriates.
Mr. MeNicol stated that he personally understood our position
but that Ambassador Spender would wish to call the Department on
Monday to discuss the matter further.
Subsequently,
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to