Memorandum of Conversation with Hume Wrong, John D. Hickerson, and Ward Allen
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
519785484
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3NLT (KOREA/SO, 537
DelR
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
TOP SECRET
SECURITY
INFORMATION
Memorandum of Conversation
DATE: December 6, 1951
SUBJECT: Korean Armistice
PARTICIPANTS: Ambassador Wrong, Canada
Mr. Hickerson - UNA
Mr. Ward Allen - EUR
DECLASSIFIED
COPIES TO: C - Mr. Bohlen
- Mr. Matthews
Fleus 1951 Vol.
G
Authority
UNA - Mr. Hickerson
EUR - Mr. Bonbright
By DEB NLT
Date 3-5-85
FE - Mr. Johnson
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
16-61120-1
Ambassador Wrong had been requested by Foreign Minister Pearson from
Paris to obtain clarification of US views on certain aspects of the proposed
declaration to be issued in the event of an armistice and the courses of
action to be followed in the event of a violation. The UK have given Canada
(as well as Australia, New Zealand and South Africa) copies of Foreign Minister
Eden's telegram to Churchill reporting on the Acheson-Eden meeting in Rome
November 27, and Mr. Churchill's reply to Eden. Based on these, Mr. Pearson
raised the following points:
1. Consultation: He feels that Canada should have been consulted by the
US directly before now and not be expected to obtain its information solely
through the British. He feared that without direct consultations Canada
"might be confronted with US-UK agreement and be asked to accept it unaltered
or without sufficient time for consideration." Ambassador Wrong suggested it
would therefore be tactful and desirable that the Department keep him informed.
Mr. Pearson had suggested using the Washington liaison arrangements of those
countries fighting in Korea for a general discussion of the future courses of
action. However, Ambassador Wrong readily agreed with Mr. Hickerson's view
that this was not the appropriate procedure, and in response to Ambassador
Wrong's request Mr. Hickerson assured him that we would discuss the matter with
Canada directly. Mr. Hickerson, however, indicated our concern that the UK
had at this juncture brought in all four senior Commonwealth members since we
did not yet want to consult widely and were worried about French reaction if
they should discover that they had not been consulted as early as the UK and
the Commonwealth.
042903
"TOP SECRET
6
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to