Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
519785689
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2D
INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
t
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
29-22-X
Action
Control: 2431
UNA
Rec'd: January 6, 1952
FROM: Paris
6:09 p.m.
Info
SS
TO:
Secretary of State
G
DECLASSIFIED
L
NO: DELGA 892, January 6, 11 p.m.
E.O. 12065,
DMS
State Dept. Guidelines arch 6, 1982
SMSA
PRIORITY.
4-5-75
EUR
FE
PSB
Re Korean problem in First Comite.
P
DCR
Further to DELGA 870, there are indications that, while Son
will probably not (rpt not) oppose postponement of Korean
item, they will press for immediate consideration their en-3
tire res under old Sov item, including point re Korea. One
indication their interest in discussing their views on Korea
now (rpt now) is play they are giving to subject in connection
CMC item. Moreover, Tsarapkin emphasized Korea in talk with
Cooper Jan 38 Malik with Gross Jan 4 stating that Sov res on
CMC item was intended help negotiations in Korea by "raising
level of discussion". (See DELGA 889.)
In light probable Sov pressure to have premature discussion
Korean ques, USGADEL contemplates proceeding along fol lines
when CMC item including SOT res disposed of.
1. After vote on CMC res and negative vote on Sov res,
comite w.l.d be asked postpone consideration Korean item or
ground that consideration here while armistice negots were
proceeding eld only hamper negots. We wild put our views or
this in most positive form, emphasizing our desire and that
of all peace-loving countries to see Panmunion negots carried
through to successful conclusion at earliest possible moment
without obstruction by debate in Paris.
2. Sov item wld be next, and Chairman Moe has told US that
at outset he intends urge all members in line with earlier
decision to postpone Korean item, to refrain from discussing
Korean ques in connection Sow item. We wild speak at first
opportunity either at once or after SOT delegate spoke to his
res, stating our readiness comply with chairman's suggestion
using arguments in support of motion to postpone Korean item.
Wld induce other dels to take same line. In course considera and
tion Sov res which w.l.d be submitted, we w.ld either vote against
res or to seek postpomement of para on Korea, depending OM
tactical situation, in line with decision postpone Korean item
and with Moe's request.
3. Alternative
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
REPRODUCTION OF
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to