Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
134406562
label
Memorandum for Secretary of State James Byrnes from Samuel Rosenman
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
134406562
contentType
document
title
Memorandum for Secretary of State James Byrnes from Samuel Rosenman
collections
Records of the Naval Aide to the President (Truman Administration)
Berlin Conference Files
subjects
Potsdam Conference, 1945
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
134406562
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
1
logicalDate
1945-08-01
month
8
year
1945
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
photo
mediaId
7eb39d4814acf597
ocrText
August 1, 1945 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF STATE: Bob Jackson tried to reach you, and when he couldn't, asked for me, and he discussed with me the present situation on war criminals. The meeting scheduled for this morning did not take place, because of the opening of Parliament and the necessity of the Lord Chancellor being present at the opening. The meeting has been postponed for to- morrow. I told Bob that anything that was to be done had to be done at today's meeting. His views are: 1. That we should refuse emphatically to name any of the war criminals. 2. That we should not commit ourselves here to an international tribunal for purposes of trial. As to the second point, Bob has come to feel very strongly that it would be better not to have a joint tribunal because of the difficulty of working with the Russians in a trial. He feels that if the Resians, however, in London accept the various propositions which we have made, that he is comm tted to favor a joint tribunal, and does not feel that he can back out of it merely on the ground that it would be difficult to get along. If, however, they do not accede to our suggestions as to defini- tion of a war crime and certain other matters, he will then take the course of having each nation try the criminals in its respective juris- diction. He was even of the thought that the British, French and Americans might agree to a joint trial, leaving the Russians out. I expressed to him my personal opinion that that would be quite a slap at the Russians, leading to recriminations, whereas it would not be quite so bad if it was decided that each nation would try its own war crimin- al prisoners. At any rate, nothing will be done before tomorrow, and 1 said I would phone him from some place in England and find out what has hap- pened. fen SAM I. ROSENMAN