Memorandum, Reply to the Questions Presented by Admiral Leahy to the General of the Army Antonov at the Conference
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
134406651
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2REPLY TO THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED BY
ADMIRAL LEAHY TO THE GENERAL OF THE
ARMY ANTONOV AT THE CONFERENCE ON
27-7-45.
26 today
Concerning the first question. The Soviet command agrees to establish at
Petropavlosk and at Habarovsk, radio stations for transmission of Soviet
weather. As per request stated in President Truman's letter transmitted
on 23 July 45, the Soviet command is ready to accept radio stations with
equipment as offered in this letter, and to put them to use for the above
mentioned purpose. So far as the operating maintenance personnel is
concerned, it is considered most practical to make use of Soviet person-
nel which already is quite experienced in operating (or working) with
American stations. Besides these two stations, the network of local
stations will be increased to furnish weather information.
Concerning the second question. To have in the Japanese Sea separate
zones of action for the navies and air forces of the U.S.A. and of the
Soviet Union. To have a boundary between these zones along the follow-
ing line:
Cape Boltin on the coastline of Korea at a point 40 degrees longitude
north and 135 degrees latitude east, a point 45 degrees 45 minutes long-
itude north and 140 degrees latitude east, from where the line follows
the 45 degrees 45 minute parallel longitude north, up to the line con-
necting Cape Crillion on the southern extremity of the southern Sakhalin
Island, with Cape Soya Misaki (on the northern extremity of Hokkaido
Island) The Soviet fleet and air force to operate to the north of this
boundary, the U. S. fleet and air force to operate to the south of this
boundary. This boundary must be the boundary of action for both the
surface as well as for the sub-surface fleets, and air forces. This
boundary can be subjected to change, depending upon the futuresitua-
S.
tion. Operations of thenavy and air force of the U.S. to the north of
English
this boundary, and the operations of the navy and air force of the
us
Soviet Union to the south of this boundary, must be subjected to co-
ordination.
BOYER
To have the Sea of Okhotsk as a zone of mutual operations for the navy
and air forces of the U.S. and of the Soviet Union: Operations in the
Sea of Okhotsk will have to be carried out according to mutual coordin-
ation. To have in the Bering Sea a zone of mutual operations of our
Pacific Fleet and of the .S.A. Fleet, bounded on the north, east, and
south by a line passing from Cape Dejneva to the Island of Diomidas, and
further along the boundary of territorial waters of the U.S.S.R. and
U.S.A., up to the 51 degree 30 minute parallel longitude north, and
further through the points in the 50 degree 35 minute longitude north
and 157 degree latitude east, a point 49 degrees 50 minute longitude
north and 156 degrees 20 minute latitude east, along the 49 degree
50 minute parallel longitude north, up to the fourth Kuril Strait.
The
remainder of the Sea of Bering same as the adjoining sections of the
Pacific Ocean will have to be the zone of operations of the U. S.
Fleet.
Concerning the third question. To have the boundary in the Korea and
Manchuria between the zones of operations of the U.S. and Soviet air
forces along the following line: Cape Boltin; Chaichun; Liacuan;
Kailou; Chifin; Beipin; Dagu and further along the southern border of
the inner Mongolia. The U.S. air force operates to the south of this
line, including all the enumerated points. The Soviet air force
DECLASSIFIED
JCS Memo, Jan. 17, 1973
YOR
BYNLTHW NARS, Date 6-29-76
Terms
Subject
Potsdam Conference, 1945
Relations
belongs_to