Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196064708
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT
Naval Aide) 392
OFFICE OF
DECLASSIFIED
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
the
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
WASHINGTON
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 9-1085
September 10, 1952
TOP SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
TRYGVE LIE'S
Prior to Mr. Lie's departure for Europe to
TRIP TO EUROPE: discuss the Korean situation with Eden and
Schuman, our mission at the UN stressed to Lie that he should
avoid any implication to the British and French that he is in any
way acting as an agent of the US. Also, US strongly believes
additional measures should be taken by the forthcoming GA rela-
tive to allied support of the Korean effort. We consider General
Assembly recommendations for additional measures thoroughly
warranted since they would more nearly equalize the burden borne
by the US and other members and are a matter of simple equity
to the US people. We feel GA failure to take action signalizing
UN intention to persevere in and strengthen resistance to Communist
aggression in Korea would redouble Communist intransigence and
hamper armistice negotiations and that it is possible that additional
political and economic measures of the type we envisage might
tip the delicate balance of forces motivating the Communists so
as to induce them to reach agreement at Panmunjom. We are
as eager as we have ever been to obtain additional UN forces for
Korea, would welcome anything Lie could do to obtain such forces
but doubt whether either France or UK is in a position to effect
greater contributions. Emphasis might appropriately be placed
on obtaining forces from countries which have not yet made mili-
tary contributions.
Upon being informed of the foregoing, Mr. Lie
expressed major concern that the UN would suffer greatly unless
some positive and affirmative UN action" is taken. He believes
that unless there are increased troop contributions and possibly
other measures as well, the Communists "would have won the
second round" and neither US public opinion would tolerate such
a result nor would the UN survive it. He wishes to impress upon
Eden and Pearson, both of whom he will see in London on
September 11, the importance of UK and Canadian Governments
taking the initiative to contribute or obtain 20 or 30,000 additional
troops and to drop any idea that the UN should "sit by and see what
happens.'
TOP SECRET SECURITY INEORMATION