Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196816656
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(Naval Aide) 168
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
Dept. 6, 1982
E.O.
February 7, 1951
State By DEB NLT, Date 9-4-85
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
UNITED KINGDOM
Embassy London reports that the extent
of Labor Party worry about today's Parlia-
mentary vote on steel nationalization has been revealed by the publication
of an exchange of letters dated February 5 between Attlee and Churchill.
In the letter Attlee requested a pair for a Labor member on official busi-
ness in South Africa and indicated that unless a pair could be arranged he
had no alternative but to recall the individual for the vote. The Embassy
believes that the Government may, however, be aided by a possible Liberal
split. Although the Liberals have consistently voted against nationalization
of steel, they met yesterday without reaching a decision on today's vote.
It is also reported that Lady Megan Lloyd-George and at least one other
Liberal are not willing to contribute to the fall of the Government and
efforts may be made to obtain Liberal unanimity on a basis of all abstain- -
ing. The most recent Gallup Poll has showed 51 percent of the population
in favor of the Conservatives and only 38 percent for Labor. The Conser-
-
vatives are convinced that a defeat of the Government and a general elec -
tion would result in a decisive victory for them.
MEETING OF
The conference of Ambassadors now meeting
FOREIGN MINISTERS
in Frankfort has commented that the attack in
the latest Soviet note on the general build-up
of western defense as contrasted to German rearmament alone affords an
excellent opportunity for a vigorous response from the western allies plac -
ing the matter in proper perspective and turning world attention to the gener-
al aggressive attitude of the Soviets and their excessive military strength
in being. The conference believes that the time has arrived when we should
adopt a positive approach by clearly identifying the basic causes of tension
and full Soviet responsibility. We must point out that the question of Ger- -
man disarmament or any other question involving Germany must be dealt
with in relation to those broad issues which have created the specific prob-
lems to which the Soviets now wish to limit the discussion. Inasmuch as
the Soviets have mentioned that the allies have not stated precisely what
they consider to be the causes of international tension, the conference believes
it important to list these principle causes with ample details and examples.