Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196816742
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(Naval A.de) 203
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
May 17, 1951
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
IRAN
The British Embassy has informed the Department
that the British Government is sending additional
instructions to Ambassador Shepherd in Tehran concerning his approach
to Prime Minister Mossadeq. Shepherd is to suggest to Mossadeq that
the British are willing to cooperate in Iran's national aspirations in re-
gard to their oil, but that Mossadeq must realize that his own program
will fail if he makes it impossible for the company to continue to operate
effectively; Britain is willing to help Persia, including giving it economic
assistance, but the UK cannot accept Persia's right to repudiate contracts;
it objects strongly to the wording of the Majlis resolutions but it is prepared
to negotiate a settlement which, provided it were satisfactory in other re-
spects (a qualification ot which the UK attaches importance), involved some
form of nationalization.
We have informed Ambassador Grady that the Depart-
ment is contemplating a public statement here in the immediate future on
the Iranian situation in view of the necessity of: 1) supporting the British,
now that they have accepted the principle of nationalization; 2) taking a
definite and clear-cut position on the general principle of the validity of
contractual relationships which is essential if US concessions are to be
maintained throughout the world; and 3) driving home to the Iranians the
difficulties they face if the AIOC is expelled.
We have also informed Ambassador Grady that the Depart-
ment has discussed the Iranian question with representatives of the major US
oil companies with Middle East interests. These representatives were un-
animous in stating that no responsible company would under present circum-
-
stances attempt to secure managerial concessions from the Iranian Govern-
ment, since 1) "concession jumping" jeopardizes concessions elsewhere;
and 2) the Iranian Government's action on the AIOC is such that no successor
company could have confidence in the government's honoring the contract.
These representatives, however, could not speak for independent operators
and contractors.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
S
T
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
By DEB NLT, Date 9-5-85