Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196816836
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED 12065,
1982
State Dept. E.O. Guidelines, NLT, Date March 9-5-88 6,
June 5, 1951
By DEB
SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
PARIS FOUR
In commenting on the Soviet rejection of the
POWER TALKS
Western notes, Ambassador Jessup says that
the chief difficulty to be anticipated now in
dealing with the Soviet reply is the French attitude, due to the coming
French elections. Parodi anticipates a government decision that nothing
can be done to break off the talks before June 17th (election day). Davies
left for London last night to consult with Morrison. Davies had stated
definitely, however, as a result of conversations in London over the past
weekend that the British Government will insist on a clear statement in
Paris terminating the discussions. He said he did not exclude the possi-
bility that we could indicate to the Soviets that if they have anything new
to bring up the three governments would designate representatives in
Paris to consider the matter--i. e. the British and American ambassa-
dors. There is general agreement among the Western delegates (and
the view is shared by the Department) that any reply to the Soviets must
stress that our invitation to the Soviets still stands.
JAPANESE TREATY
Ambassador Dulles has begun talks in London
concerning the Japanese treaty. At the first
talk Mr. Morrison said he accepted the principle of a quick and liberal
peace, but that Japanese wrongs and cruelties are not forgotten and could
not be wholly ignored in the treaty. He said that armaments should be
specified and a limit set beyond which the Japanese could not go without
the consent of the Allied powers. He felt some recognition of mistreated
prisoners of war and their families should be accorded, for which pur-
pose all or part of Japan's gold should be applied. Moreover, Formosa's
status should be unchanged, and there should be no participation on be -
half of China at present. Mr. Morrison also indicated that the British
would need more details on commercial and financial matters. Dulles
points out that the only major surprise in the above is the British pro-
posal for limiting rearmament, which is directly contrary to the position
expressed in the British aide-memoire of March 12th.
SECREI