Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
201681585
label
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
201681585
contentType
document
title
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
collections
Records of the Naval Aide to the President (Truman Administration)
State Department Briefs Files
subjects
Tito, Josip Broz, 1892-1980
Vyshinsky, Andrey Yanuaryevich, 1883-1954
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
201681585
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
23
logicalDate
1949-06-23
month
6
year
1949
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
photo
mediaId
d04079664babf5bb
ocrText
DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON June 23, 1949 SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS USSR Embassy Moscow believes that the Soviets willingness to mark time as indicated in their attitude at the Paris CFM is fundamentally attributable to the Kremlin's belief that a big capitalist crisis is coming much faster than had previously been expected. The Embassy, however, finds Vyshinski's defensive attitude and apparent improvisation at the conference puzzling and suggests that some basic change in Moscow's tactics may have taken place not long before the meeting which may have been caused by the revelation in the Soviet zone elections of the extent of the popular rebellion against the Soviets in their zone and of the weakness of their organization there. The Embassy thinks that another possible cause may have been recent indications of unexpected weakness in the satellites, making it inadvisable for the Soviets to withdraw their troops from Germany and Austria, and that, consequently, progress toward a detailed working out of agreed principles on an Austrian treaty will depend primarily on Soviet success in reorganizing and tightening up the Communist apparatus in the satellite countries and the Soviet zones of occupation. TRIESTE The Yugoslav Assistant Foreign Minister, in discussion with the British Charge in Belgrade of the Soviet abandonment of Yugoslavia on the Austrian border issue, has inquired concerning the possibility of a compromise being reached on Triests. The British Charge informed him that his government might consider sympathetically any reasonable arrangement that the Yugoslavs might work out with the Italians. Our Charge in Belgrade suggests that we might reexamine our position on Trieste with a view to possibly bringing some pressure on the Italians to accept some solution other than the return of the entire territory to Italy, pointing out that if the Soviets should adhere to our present po- sition on the return of the entire territory we might be placed in the position of endangering our entire policy of keeping Tito afloat, since the Yugoslavs would almost certainly not withdraw from the sector of Trieste they occupy and we would not be able to continue helping Tito in the face of such defiance of our wishes. He believes that Soviet adherence to our position could be the most effective means open to them to bring about Tito's downfall. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402 State Dept. Guideline, June 12, 1979 By NLT- NC NARS, Date 11-13-to