Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
201681732
label
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
201681732
contentType
document
title
Memorandum, State Department Summary of Telegrams
collections
Records of the Naval Aide to the President (Truman Administration)
State Department Briefs Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
201681732
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
8
logicalDate
1949-09-08
month
9
year
1949
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
photo
mediaId
eb5e47bc51f8d629
ocrText
DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON September 8, 1949 I SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS TRIESTE While detailed answers to all questions concerning the future of Trieste with reference to the current Soviet- Yugoslav dispute cannot be given without fuller information and more detailed study, we are informing our representatives in Trieste that: 1) even if Yugoslavia is attacked our present estimate is that there will be prolonged Tito resistance in substantial areas of Yugoslavia; 2) in the event a Cominform regime is established in Yugoslavia, we have no intention of abandoning our support for the eventual return of all Trieste to Italy. While we agree that a rigid segration of the two zones should be maintained in the event of a Cominform take over, we are considering in case there is no radi- cal change in the Yugoslav situation the desirability of establishing joint bodies to consider common problems arising in the Yugoslav and the US-UK zones of Trieste. AUSTRIA We have again informed our representatives in London that we do not believe the immediate dispatch of a note to Moscow merely covering the reconvening of the Austrian deputies in New York will fulfill our objectives and we prefer to have the first approach a one package presentation of both the procedural and the substantive issues. The French are reported to be agreeable toeither procedure, while the British have still not agreed to our proposal. They continue to feel that the opening approach should be made as soon as possible without waiting for tripartite agreement on the substan- tive line to be taken. DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402 State Dept. Guideline, June 12, 1979 By NLT- we NARS, Date 11-13-to