Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
202649672
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(Naval A.del144
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
December 28, 1950
By
DEB NLT, Date 6-18-65
TOP SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
COUNCIL OF
In view of the comments of the French and
FOREIGN MINISTERS
UK UN delegates reflecting the view that a
Council of Foreign Ministers meeting
should and will be held, we have informed our UN delegation that our
position has been, and continues to be, that a Ministerial meeting
should be held only if preliminary talks indicate a "mutually acceptable
basis" which would make the meeting worthwhile. We pointed out that
we agreed to the final wording of the reply to the Soviet Union on the
explicit understanding that the replies should not be regarded as
acceptance of a meeting in advance of the outcome of the exploratory
talks. We requested our UN delegation in all conversations to dispel
the idea that a Ministerial meeting is certain to be held, or that if
held, Far Eastern questions would as a matter of course be on the
agenda.
In the meantime, UK and France have con-
curred in the desirability of commencing the first round of tripartite
discussions with the US as soon as possible for an exchange of views
on a possible meeting. In conveying this information, a UK Foreign
Office official stated that the Foreign Office considered it quite
possible that in replying to the tripartite note the Soviet Union may
propose that the agenda include Far Eastern problems and that Com- -
munist China take part in these talks. He said that the British could
hardly turn down such a proposal even though they would greatly prefer
the talks to be solely on a quadripartite basis. He admitted, however,
that the participation of the Chinese Communists would have to be
preceded by a cease-fire in Korea. He also believed that the Soviets
may accept our previous proposals for all-German elections plus agree -
ment on German demilitarization as a basis for talks on Germany. He
felt that such a move would place us in an extremely embarrassing
position since a unified Germany sooner or later would fall under Soviet
domination, and anticipated that we would have great difficulty in reject-
ing such an offer.
T.O.P.O SECRET