Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

TWO-TERM CURB PLAN FINDS THE GOING HARD WASHINGTON, Jan. 22 (UP)- The proposal to limit a President to two terms is finding different gooing in State Leigslatures. Only twenty-five states have ratified the proposed Constitu- tional amendment since it was passed by Congress almost four years ago. Eleven more ratifica- tions are needed before it becomes effective. If the additional ratifi- cations have not been voted by 1954, the proposal will be dead. The twenty-five states that have ratified the proposal are Maine Michigan, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Delaware, Illinois Oregon, Colorado, California, New Jersey, Vermont, Ohio, Wisconsin Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Mis- souri, Nebraska, Virginia, Missis- sippi, New York, South Dakota North Dakota, Louisiana and In- diana. Arkansas is the only state that has voted it down. The eleven ratifications still needed therefore must come, if at all, from the Legislatures of Ala- bama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Mas sachusetts, Minnesota, Montana Nevada, New Mexico, North Caro lina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. The best chance for ratification this year are in Georgia, expected to act this week, Idaho and Wyom- ing. Montana's Republican Legis- lature also may approve the pro- posal. The outlook in the rest of the states is uncertain or against ratification. Even if the amendment should be ratified before the next Presi- dential election, which seems un- likely, it will not affect President Truman. Congress specifically ex- empted the present occupant of the White House. 1951

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
d6975183c530478b
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
174679365
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "174679365",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Newspaper Article, Two Term Curb Plan Finds the Going Hard",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the National Committee Against Limiting the Presidency",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "174679365",
    "label": "Newspaper Article, Two Term Curb Plan Finds the Going Hard",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "174679365",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Newspaper Article, Two Term Curb Plan Finds the Going Hard",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365",
    "collections": [
        "Records of the National Committee Against Limiting the Presidency",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/174679365",
    "naId": 174679365,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 22,
            "logicalDate": "1951-01-22",
            "month": 1,
            "year": 1951
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-nca/1747701/85557215/85557215-03-01.jpg",
    "mediaId": "d6975183c530478b",
    "ocrText": "TWO-TERM CURB PLAN\nFINDS THE GOING HARD\nWASHINGTON, Jan. 22 (UP)-\nThe proposal to limit a President\nto two terms is finding different\ngooing in State Leigslatures.\nOnly twenty-five states have\nratified the proposed Constitu-\ntional amendment since it was\npassed by Congress almost four\nyears ago. Eleven more ratifica-\ntions are needed before it becomes\neffective. If the additional ratifi-\ncations have not been voted by\n1954, the proposal will be dead.\nThe twenty-five states that have\nratified the proposal are Maine\nMichigan, Iowa, Kansas, New\nHampshire, Delaware, Illinois\nOregon, Colorado, California, New\nJersey, Vermont, Ohio, Wisconsin\nPennsylvania, Connecticut, Mis-\nsouri, Nebraska, Virginia, Missis-\nsippi, New York, South Dakota\nNorth Dakota, Louisiana and In-\ndiana.\nArkansas is the only state that\nhas voted it down.\nThe eleven ratifications still\nneeded therefore must come, if at\nall, from the Legislatures of Ala-\nbama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia\nIdaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Mas\nsachusetts, Minnesota, Montana\nNevada, New Mexico, North Caro\nlina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island\nSouth Carolina, Tennessee, Texas\nUtah,\nWashington,\nWest\nVirginia\nand Wyoming.\nThe best chance for ratification\nthis year are in Georgia, expected\nto act this week, Idaho and Wyom-\ning. Montana's Republican Legis-\nlature also may approve the pro-\nposal. The outlook in the rest of\nthe states is uncertain or against\nratification.\nEven if the amendment should\nbe ratified before the next Presi-\ndential election, which seems un-\nlikely, it will not affect President\nTruman. Congress specifically ex-\nempted the present occupant of the\nWhite House.\n1951"
}