Letter from Congressman J. Parnell Thomas to President Harry S. Truman
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
310800609
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3EIGHTIETH CONGRESS
J. PARNELL THOMAS, N. J., CHAIRMAN
320-73
KARL E. MUNDT, S. DAK.
JOHN S. WOOD, GA.
JOHN McDOWELL, PA.
JOHN E. RANKIN, MISS.
RICHARD M. NIXON, CALIF.
J. HARDIN PETERSON, FLA.
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES
RICHARD B. VAIL, ILL.
F. EDWARD HEBERT, LA.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ROBERT E. STRIPLING, CHIEF INVESTIGATOR
WHITE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES
HOUSE
WASHINGTON
SEP
30
8
25
AM
September 'UR 29, 1948.
RECEIVED
The President
The White House
Washington, D. C.
Filed 10-5-48-
My dear Mr. President:
For a long time the Committee on Un-American Activities has been
#
striving diligently to unearth the facts of the Communist conspiracy in
the United States and its infiltration into the Government service. It has
been necessary to do this because your administration has failed to keep
the people informed about this dangerous situation which now belatedly is
being recognized for what it really is. Why you and your Attorney General
have attempted to obstruct and thwart our pursuit of the facts can best be
tile
answered by yourself.
The evidence of Communist espionage was laid on your desk more of
than three years ago. Since that time can you recall one action that has
been taken to punish those guilty of spying in the United States? Where
and when has your Attorney General prosecuted in public courts a single
x10-mise
agent of the Russian espionage ring? The evidence has been gathered
x10-B
diligently by the FBI for many years. Why has it been allowed to gather
dust in their files?
Several weeks ago, when we were conducting hearings on Communist
espionage activities within the Government, you attempted to dismiss and
discredit these hearings as being "a red herring." At a later press
conference, you reiterated this charge. Apparently you have found out
on your tour that the people did not agree with you, for I notice in
263
x252-JL
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to