Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
537438846
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Dear Mr. Trumen:
I
As a friend of Mrs. Roosevelt, I
thought you should see the letter below.
101 provel.
22 Dolphin Green
allan nern
Port Wa hington, N. Y.
July 23, 1949
To the Editor Roosercit-Spellum of the New York Times:
The letter written by Cardinal Spellman to Mrs. Roosevelt
and published in the July 23 issue of THE TIMES is full of
verbiage that has nothing to do with the matter. Clear think-
ing by all of our citizens is necessary to preserve the free-
doms of our form of government; the irrelevant statements of
the Cardinal appear to be attempts to confuse the thoughts of
the many people who will read his letter. Beclouding the issue
by references to events that merely provoke emotional response,
is certainly no way to arrive at a clear understanding of the
merits of the Barden bill. Dragging in the case of Cardinal
Mindzenty and the sacrifices of the Catholic boys during the
war is no more pertinent than it would be for me to refer to
the aid given Nazi Germany by Spain during the last war, or
the controversy between the church and the state in Mexico.
None of these things have any bearing on whether the Barden
bill should limit the use of Federal tax money to public schools.
To those of your readers who think clearly the Cardinal's
words that read, "misinformation, ignorance or prejudice, not
from knowledge and understanding" seem to apply directly to his
statements rather than to Mrs. Roosevelt's column. The Cardinal
has placed himself in a ridiculous position by attacking Mrs.
Roosevelt for intolerance. Her record of many years of active
effort in promoting racial and religious understanding is too
well known to be tarnished by such evident propaganda by a high
representative of well-organized pressure group.
No one denies the right of the Catholics to maintain their
own schools any more than the right is denied to the Baptists,
Jews, Episcopalians, Ethical Culturists, Agnostics, Atheists,
Quakers etc., but if they wish to operate outside the public
school system, it is their responsibility to provide the necess-
ary funds. At the present time (in my opinion, wrongly so) re-
ligious institutions receive exemption from most of the taxes on
income-producing properties not directly used for religious pur-
poses; yet the Catholics would seek to secure more funds from the
public treasury.
The real facts are that, if the people of any faith wish to
secure the benefit from any educational appropiations for the
common good, they are at liberty to send their children to the
public schools. Under the present system, our country has been
able to maintain a high level of intelligent citizenry. Any
attempt to undermine that system should be resisted by all who
wish to maintain our precious freedoms.
"LET'S BE FAIR."
Copies to Mrs. Roosevelt, President Truman, Senators Ives and Dulles
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to