Ask the Scholar

Page 166 of 294
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 166

OCR

Chapter 15-1, Conclusions and Inferences 221 avoid these enthusiasms and "sure" paths to victory and to concentrate on the Job interest as the only hard economic reality in the wage earner's life. Labor's "dis- coveries," learned by trial and error, also extended to the American community as a whole-the "public," to the employers and to the government. Labor learned that an attack, or even what might be misconstrued as an intended attack, on private property and private enterprise as institutions would only be a free gift to its enemies; that employers, if the gods were willing, could be coerced or sometimes cajoled into a joint job administration under a trade agreement; that the structure of political action in the United States doomed a labor party setting up in competition with the "old" parties but opened a possibility for carrying col- lective bargaining into politics and even, under the system of "primary" elections, for an "infiltration" of the old parties; and finally, that the American government with its states' rights, judicial review and general checks and balances was a very limited instrument for labor's good and often a menace to labor's self-help poten- tial, and one which needed to be warded off (for example, the Sherman Anti-trust Act). The assailants of Gompers' job conscious unionism have consistently viewed it as a phenomenon in labor movement pathology. To the extreme "left" job con- sciousness remains a case of a hopeless degeneration of vital tissue; to the "cen- trists" in the radical movement it is a case of an arrested development to be overcome by suitable ideological injections. However, notwithstanding the verbal rigidity which Gompers and his associates have often employed, this job con- scious philosophy, itself the product of an evolution, was one with an "open end"-toward further evolutionary development. In essence it has been an emphasis on what is nuclear, on what is the central core of labor's interest, which when uncomplicated by personalities, passion and dogmatism, itself compels a widening of the area of labor's interest, with changing conditions. These all-important changing conditions were brought about by the New Deal. The revolution effected by the New Deal in American government was in spirit quite like the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian revolutions, and in its permanent effect on the structure of government has even exceeded its predecessors. The Roosevelt attack on the United States Supreme Court in February 1937 followed, for what- ever reason, by the Court's "counter-reformation," has put together the American government of limited powers into a more powerful instrument. Since the Court's decisions in the spring of 1937, American labor has been fully aware of the utility of government as a tool. These decisions have simultaneously enfranchised gov- ernment, both Federal and State, in the sphere of industrial relations and freed the former of the straightjacket of "State's rights." Consequently, the politico-legisla- tive arena has ceased to be a place where labor could merely pursue a mirage, revealed as such when the courts declared unconstitutional the painfully attained labor protective laws. It has now become a real front where enduring victories could be won. And the extreme variety of "pure and simple" unionism with its decisive inhibition against free participation in politics has therefore become

Page data

Page
166
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
0fe647608de11b0f
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
486289714
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "486289714",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Perlman, Selig",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714",
    "collections": [
        "Philip M. Kaiser Papers",
        "Correspondence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 294,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "486289714",
    "label": "Perlman, Selig",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "486289714",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Perlman, Selig",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714",
    "collections": [
        "Philip M. Kaiser Papers",
        "Correspondence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 294,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/486289714",
    "naId": 486289714,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 166,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-pmk/485327406/486289714/486289714-166.tif",
    "mediaId": "0fe647608de11b0f",
    "ocrText": "Chapter 15-1, Conclusions and Inferences\n221\navoid these enthusiasms and \"sure\" paths to victory and to concentrate on the Job\ninterest as the only hard economic reality in the wage earner's life. Labor's \"dis-\ncoveries,\" learned by trial and error, also extended to the American community as\na whole-the \"public,\" to the employers and to the government.\nLabor learned that an attack, or even what might be misconstrued as an intended\nattack, on private property and private enterprise as institutions would only be a\nfree gift to its enemies; that employers, if the gods were willing, could be coerced\nor sometimes cajoled into a joint job administration under a trade agreement; that\nthe structure of political action in the United States doomed a labor party setting\nup in competition with the \"old\" parties but opened a possibility for carrying col-\nlective bargaining into politics and even, under the system of \"primary\" elections,\nfor an \"infiltration\" of the old parties; and finally, that the American government\nwith its states' rights, judicial review and general checks and balances was a very\nlimited instrument for labor's good and often a menace to labor's self-help poten-\ntial, and one which needed to be warded off (for example, the Sherman Anti-trust\nAct).\nThe assailants of Gompers' job conscious unionism have consistently viewed it\nas a phenomenon in labor movement pathology. To the extreme \"left\" job con-\nsciousness remains a case of a hopeless degeneration of vital tissue; to the \"cen-\ntrists\" in the radical movement it is a case of an arrested development to be\novercome by suitable ideological injections. However, notwithstanding the verbal\nrigidity which Gompers and his associates have often employed, this job con-\nscious philosophy, itself the product of an evolution, was one with an \"open\nend\"-toward further evolutionary development. In essence it has been an\nemphasis on what is nuclear, on what is the central core of labor's interest, which\nwhen uncomplicated by personalities, passion and dogmatism, itself compels a\nwidening of the area of labor's interest, with changing conditions. These\nall-important changing conditions were brought about by the New Deal.\nThe revolution effected by the New Deal in American government was in spirit\nquite like the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian revolutions, and in its permanent effect\non the structure of government has even exceeded its predecessors. The Roosevelt\nattack on the United States Supreme Court in February 1937 followed, for what-\never reason, by the Court's \"counter-reformation,\" has put together the American\ngovernment of limited powers into a more powerful instrument. Since the Court's\ndecisions in the spring of 1937, American labor has been fully aware of the utility\nof government as a tool. These decisions have simultaneously enfranchised gov-\nernment, both Federal and State, in the sphere of industrial relations and freed the\nformer of the straightjacket of \"State's rights.\" Consequently, the politico-legisla-\ntive arena has ceased to be a place where labor could merely pursue a mirage,\nrevealed as such when the courts declared unconstitutional the painfully attained\nlabor protective laws. It has now become a real front where enduring victories\ncould be won. And the extreme variety of \"pure and simple\" unionism with its\ndecisive inhibition against free participation in politics has therefore become"
}