Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
563886643
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 26-1
Wm Odman
2004 42nd Norh
Seattle, Wash
Dear Mr. President:
I am sorry to read of your anti-strike bill. I
believe that it is unconstitutional and reeks a little of facisism.
The first thing Hitler did after getting the oath of loyalty from
all German army officers was to smash the trade unions. I realize that
a railroad strike would be disasterous not only to our own people but
to those abroad, but big business is using this and the government to
set back labor many years. The railroad workers should have got the
wage increase they demanded in
the first place and whatever safety
regulations they deemed necessary. I never read anywhere in the press
the hourly wage scale of all railroad workers or their weekly take
home pay, but merely the daily increase they demanded. It reminds me
of when I was in the army how a different course was taken to make
the people more sympathetic to the service. The enlisted mans pay
was published many times but never once did I see the pay and allowances
of officers published in a large daily. I understand that the rail-
road workers worked all through the war at
the same hourly rate they
got immediately before the war. I would be willing to wager that public
opinion would have been different if the hourly wage rates were
published so that all could see.
The only recourse a working man has is to strike, he has no other
weapon. It is his only protection. He can't even exercise that to its
best advantage because what average workingman with a family can stay
out of employment long? I believe Mr. President that it would be
possible for the government to take over other industries that were
threatened with strike and then maintain that the workers were strik-
ing against the govt and people. I can think of no more effective
Relations
belongs_to