Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
563887279
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 277/25/50
317 East 93 St.
P.P.F.
New York City 28
July 22, 1950
200
Mr. Harry S. Truman
President of the United States
Blair House
7/19/50
Washington, D. C.
Cor
Dear Mr. President:
W
Profound distress and disappointment at listening to your speech to the people on Wednesday
has prompted me to write this letter.
You gave us no hope, Mr. President, that renewed and stronger effort to end bloodshed and
establish peace would be made. You promised us only more war. You did not mention super-
human effort to mediate, to negotiate, even to compromise, as is necessary, often, to make
peace. You only mention superhuman sacrifice of our liberties, desires and hopes when such
sacrifices have barely matured into memories of the last war, a scant five years ago. We
have not yet begun to recover from that war.
Mr. President, you gave us no real assurance that the atomic bomb would not be used. You
must do all within your power to bar its use. You must use your strength to influence
the United Nations to ban atomic weapons and missiles everywhere, now and forever.
You must do more than that, Mr. President. Please, I beg you, halt the warfare in Korea.
Command the withdrawal of American troops and demand a halt of intervention by our forces
in Indo-China and in China. We don't belong in any of those places.
Let the United Nations take over, Mr. President. We - our country- can give the United
Nations the means to function properly if we will recognize the People's Republic of China.
This will restore the United Nations as a working organization for peace, and there, on
its floors, criticisms can be made, accusations discussed and the problems of peace solved.
I have looked back over the events since June 25 and find myself taking issue with your
statements. You said the North Korean attack came without provocation. Yet for months
and months, our newspapers have been reporting that Syngman Rhee has been taunting the
North Koreans, saying that he could take over North Korea in a few days, but he was merely
waiting for "say-so" from the United States and then he would attack. And just two days
before the outbreak of fighting, our newspapers published pictures of Mr. John Foster Dulles
inspecting trenches with Mr. Rhee at the 38th parallel. Isn't that provocation?
While I wish with all my heart the North Koreans had withstood such provocation, in all
fairness I could not blame them completely if, if it is true, they did attack first. Why
Was it, Mr. President, that we allowed the representative of Syngman Rhee's government to
present their case, but did not allow a representative of the North Koreans to tell their
version of this story?
Why were American troops already on their way and fighting before the Security Council
was even in session? Is General McArthur's power and authority greater than yours, that
he could take it upon himself to act before the Security Coûncil had time to act on
American resolutions ? Is General McArthur so ambitious for glory he cannot wait?
The Korean war is - or Was, until American troops entered - a civil war in exactly the terms
the Spanish revolution was a civil war. If our country could not intervene in the Spanish
civil war when such intervention might have prevented World War II, why are we interfering
Relations
belongs_to