Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

. AND completely submerged by Admiral King on every issue of strategy and utilization of Marine Forces. The views of the Commandant of the Coast Guard also were never known to the Secretaries of War or Navy or to the President because, since Admiral King had "operational control" of the Coast Guard, whatever views the Coast Guard had were presented to Admiral King who shaped them to meet his own wishes. Unless there is an organization like the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in which the heads of the various component parts of a single depart- ment have voices of equality, I believe that one or more of these components would suffer grieviously if there is a Chief of Staff of National Defense as proposed in this draft. There is no reference to a Chief of Staff to the President. The draft states that the Chief of Staff of National Defense will be the principal military advisor to the President. Admiral Leahy per- formed services invaluable to the President and to the nation in the recent war. He was not burdened with administrative problems, Congressional hearings, political pressure groups, American Legion speaking engagements and all of the multitudinous other headaches which plagued Admiral King and General Marshall and which will certainly occupy the time of a Chief of Staff of National Defense in peacetime. Admiral Leahy devoted his full time to problems of the Services, as objectively and impartially as was possible for one man to do. The President should have, or at least provision should be made, for a Chief of Staff to give the President the benefit of unbiased, impartial and mature judgment on matters of military policy. Until such time as there is a National Security Council or its equiva- lent, the President must have an advisor who can study and coordinate problems of military and foreign policy. A Chief of Staff of National Defense will not be able to do this. For some years, he will be burdened with the problems of ironing out the merger of the War and Navy Departments. He will be in no position to view the overall problems of politics, diplomacy and military affairs. He will be unable to advise the President on anything other than departmental matters. It will be far more important in the years ahead to insure that our foreign and military policies are coordinated than it will be to see that minor problems of duplication are eliminated in the single department. The latter will be the job of the Chief of Staff of National Defense, the former must be done by the President's Chief of Staff or preferably some form of security council. If and when a council is established, then the question of the President's Chief of Staff can be reviewed. The President must also have a Chief of Staff in order to coordinate the findings of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Central Research Agency. He cannot coordinate the findings of those - -3-

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
1d0d56f751fb0de5
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
183567549
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "183567549",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Clark Clifford to Sam Rosenman",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Speech Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "183567549",
    "label": "Memorandum from Clark Clifford to Sam Rosenman",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "183567549",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Clark Clifford to Sam Rosenman",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Speech Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567549",
    "naId": 183567549,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 18,
            "logicalDate": "1945-12-18",
            "month": 12,
            "year": 1945
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735119/735119-21-003.jpg",
    "mediaId": "1d0d56f751fb0de5",
    "ocrText": ". AND\ncompletely submerged by Admiral King on every issue of strategy and\nutilization of Marine Forces. The views of the Commandant of the\nCoast Guard also were never known to the Secretaries of War or Navy\nor to the President because, since Admiral King had \"operational\ncontrol\" of the Coast Guard, whatever views the Coast Guard had were\npresented to Admiral King who shaped them to meet his own wishes.\nUnless there is an organization like the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in\nwhich the heads of the various component parts of a single depart-\nment have voices of equality, I believe that one or more of these\ncomponents would suffer grieviously if there is a Chief of Staff of\nNational Defense as proposed in this draft.\nThere is no reference to a Chief of Staff to the President.\nThe draft states that the Chief of Staff of National Defense will be\nthe principal military advisor to the President. Admiral Leahy per-\nformed services invaluable to the President and to the nation in\nthe recent war. He was not burdened with administrative problems,\nCongressional hearings, political pressure groups, American Legion\nspeaking engagements and all of the multitudinous other headaches\nwhich plagued Admiral King and General Marshall and which will\ncertainly occupy the time of a Chief of Staff of National Defense\nin peacetime. Admiral Leahy devoted his full time to problems of\nthe Services, as objectively and impartially as was possible for\none man to do.\nThe President should have, or at least provision should be\nmade, for a Chief of Staff to give the President the benefit of\nunbiased, impartial and mature judgment on matters of military policy.\nUntil such time as there is a National Security Council or its equiva-\nlent, the President must have an advisor who can study and coordinate\nproblems of military and foreign policy. A Chief of Staff of National\nDefense will not be able to do this. For some years, he will be\nburdened with the problems of ironing out the merger of the War and\nNavy Departments. He will be in no position to view the overall\nproblems of politics, diplomacy and military affairs. He will be\nunable to advise the President on anything other than departmental\nmatters. It will be far more important in the years ahead to insure\nthat our foreign and military policies are coordinated than it will\nbe to see that minor problems of duplication are eliminated in the\nsingle department. The latter will be the job of the Chief of Staff\nof National Defense, the former must be done by the President's Chief\nof Staff or preferably some form of security council. If and when a\ncouncil is established, then the question of the President's Chief\nof Staff can be reviewed.\nThe President must also have a Chief of Staff in order to\ncoordinate the findings of the Central Intelligence Agency and the\nCentral Research Agency. He cannot coordinate the findings of those\n- -3-"
}