Ask the Scholar
Page 6 of 9
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
6
on the contrary
On the I am convinced that it would increase
industrial strife.
soon
security clauses in
The bill would upset thousands of existing agreements
between labor and management. These agreements were mutually arrived
at and furnish a satisfactory basis for relations between worker
and employer. They provide stability in industry. with their present
Miami SERVIOE
ARCHIVES
If
types of agreements outlawed by this bill, the parties would have to
find a new basis for agreement. The restrictions in this bill would
900
make the process of reaching new agreements a long and bitter one.
The bill would increase industrial strife because a number
of fundamental
of its provisions deprive workers of legal protection for sights they
rights
now
They would then have no means for protecting those rights
of these
enjoy.
except by striking.
The bill would open up opportunities for endless law suits
by employers against unions and by unions against employers. For
example, it would make employers vulnerable to an immense number of
law suits, since grievances, however minor, could be taken into court
by dissatisfied workers.
Insofar as employers are concerned, I predict that if
this bill should become law they would regret the day that it was
conceived. It is loaded with provisions that would
Page data
- Page
- 6
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 18737cb7d72c8b33
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 183567743
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "183567743",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Draft, Address to the American People on the Veto of the Taft-Hartley Bill",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Speech Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "183567743",
"label": "Draft, Address to the American People on the Veto of the Taft-Hartley Bill",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "183567743",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Draft, Address to the American People on the Veto of the Taft-Hartley Bill",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Speech Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-01.jpg",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/183567743",
"naId": 183567743,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"dateQualifier": "ca.",
"logicalDate": "1947-06-01",
"month": 6,
"year": 1947
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 6,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/201505/735125/735125-16-06.jpg",
"mediaId": "18737cb7d72c8b33",
"ocrText": "6\non the contrary\nOn the I am convinced that it would increase\nindustrial strife.\nsoon\nsecurity clauses in\nThe bill would upset thousands of existing agreements\nbetween labor and management. These agreements were mutually arrived\nat and furnish a satisfactory basis for relations between worker\nand employer. They provide stability in industry. with their present\nMiami SERVIOE\nARCHIVES\nIf\ntypes of agreements outlawed by this bill, the parties would have to\nfind a new basis for agreement. The restrictions in this bill would\n900\nmake the process of reaching new agreements a long and bitter one.\nThe bill would increase industrial strife because a number\nof fundamental\nof its provisions deprive workers of legal protection for sights they\nrights\nnow\nThey would then have no means for protecting those rights\nof these\nenjoy.\nexcept by striking.\nThe bill would open up opportunities for endless law suits\nby employers against unions and by unions against employers. For\nexample, it would make employers vulnerable to an immense number of\nlaw suits, since grievances, however minor, could be taken into court\nby dissatisfied workers.\nInsofar as employers are concerned, I predict that if\nthis bill should become law they would regret the day that it was\nconceived. It is loaded with provisions that would"
}