Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 5
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

Opposition to proposal (Cont'd) 1 complains of overnight changes in our foreign policy?;points out one month we ask UN for trusteeship over Pacific islands and next month by-pass UN in campaign against Russia. (Richmond News-Leader, 3/17) 4 claim possibility of democracy in Greece has already disappeared and fighting there has already gone the way of Spanish Civil War; wonder if next step for Uncle Sam will be to become one of Britain's Commonwealth of Nations; find it "something new for Congress to be directed by a foreign government as to date and hour when it must legislate in a way to drain the Treasury of the United States"; contend we should not undertake alone what UN was set up to do. (Raleigh News & Observer, 3/15, 3/17 & 3/18) 1 reverses position above by insisting Roosevelt kept his 1940 campaign pledge not to send troops abroad "unless we are attacked"; accuses some Republicans in present crisis of taking the place of ancient ghouls. (Raleigh News & Observer, 3/15) 2 are inclined to agree with John S. Knight of Detroit Free Press in his opposition to the President's proposal. (Sioux Falls Argus-Leader, 3/15; Topeka Capital, 3/16) 2 refute opposing arguments of NY Daily Worker; say Moscow and Wallace type of opposition proves the President right; claim what is bad for Russia must be good for U. S. (St. Paul Pioneer-Press, 3/14; Wilkes-Barre Times- Leader, 3/15) 32 on the President acting outside UN. 22 approve, recognizing inability of world organization to handle situation; blame bungling in setting up UN and properly implementing it; say obligation to act is clearly ours since we failed to rule power politics out of UN; want UN utilized now to "greatest feasible extent"; condemn enemies of UN for criticizing the President; would make his address to Congress not death knell of UN but new transfusion of life; find most heloful the Vandenberg statement UN is not ready to act. 6 maintain UN, not the U. S., should decide whether armed intervention is needed to keep world peace; contend moral backing of community of nations is vital, even though U. S. would have to contribute most; insist possibility of UN action should be explored before decision is made by Congress. 4 condemn Truman policy as a death blow to UN and as a risk of bankruptcy and war for us; quotes formal statements of UN leaders during past two years to prove unwisdom of the President's proposal; offer six-point fallacy of our position. (Half-page editorial with cartoons in John S. Knight chain. Detroit Free Press, Akron Beacon-Journal, Miami Herald, 3/16; Chicago News, 3/15) 20 condemn Wallace speech opposing proposal; feel Moscow must be grateful to him and fear Russia will err in thinking U. S. is not behind the President; say no situation in U. S. can be so bad that speech by Wallace won't make it worse; use such captions as "Singing Soviet Song", "Isolationists Folly", "Why Doesn't He Take Up Boomerangs Again?" "No More Munichs, Henry", "Why, Henry!", and "Henry's ¹Agin' It". 22 on reaction in Congress. 3 insist debate should be in order and without wrangling; went the President given broad discretionary power in using funds; warn against cutting Armed Services appropriations below budget requests; hail support of Vandenberg, Eaton and others. 6 praise prompt support of Vandenberg; call it outstanding example of placing patriotism above partisanship. 2 find great comfort in prompt endorsement of Sen. Lodge. 1 approves Flanders resolution to stop shipment of goods to Russia; feels it is in line with the President's plan and will help stop Red aggression. -3-

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
629567bdf7fdde18
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
213875019
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "213875019",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 5,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "213875019",
    "label": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "213875019",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 5,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
    "naId": 213875019,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 22,
            "logicalDate": "1947-03-22",
            "month": 3,
            "year": 1947
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-003.jpg",
    "mediaId": "629567bdf7fdde18",
    "ocrText": "Opposition to proposal (Cont'd)\n1 complains of overnight changes in our foreign policy?;points out one month\nwe ask UN for trusteeship over Pacific islands and next month by-pass UN\nin campaign against Russia. (Richmond News-Leader, 3/17)\n4 claim possibility of democracy in Greece has already disappeared and\nfighting there has already gone the way of Spanish Civil War; wonder if\nnext step for Uncle Sam will be to become one of Britain's Commonwealth\nof Nations; find it \"something new for Congress to be directed by a foreign\ngovernment as to date and hour when it must legislate in a way to drain the\nTreasury of the United States\"; contend we should not undertake alone what\nUN was set up to do. (Raleigh News & Observer, 3/15, 3/17 & 3/18)\n1 reverses position above by insisting Roosevelt kept his 1940 campaign pledge\nnot to send troops abroad \"unless we are attacked\"; accuses some Republicans\nin present crisis of taking the place of ancient ghouls. (Raleigh News\n&\nObserver, 3/15)\n2 are inclined to agree with John S. Knight of Detroit Free Press in his\nopposition to the President's proposal. (Sioux Falls Argus-Leader, 3/15;\nTopeka Capital, 3/16)\n2 refute opposing arguments of NY Daily Worker; say Moscow and Wallace type\nof opposition proves the President right; claim what is bad for Russia\nmust be good for U. S. (St. Paul Pioneer-Press, 3/14; Wilkes-Barre Times-\nLeader, 3/15)\n32 on the President acting outside UN.\n22 approve, recognizing inability of world organization to handle situation;\nblame bungling in setting up UN and properly implementing it; say obligation\nto act is clearly ours since we failed to rule power politics out of UN; want\nUN utilized now to \"greatest feasible extent\"; condemn enemies of UN for\ncriticizing the President; would make his address to Congress not death knell\nof UN but new transfusion of life; find most heloful the Vandenberg statement\nUN is not ready to act.\n6 maintain UN, not the U. S., should decide whether armed intervention is needed\nto keep world peace; contend moral backing of community of nations is vital,\neven though U. S. would have to contribute most; insist possibility of UN\naction should be explored before decision is made by Congress.\n4 condemn Truman policy as a death blow to UN and as a risk of bankruptcy\nand war for us; quotes formal statements of UN leaders during past two years\nto prove unwisdom of the President's proposal; offer six-point fallacy of\nour position. (Half-page editorial with cartoons in John S. Knight chain.\nDetroit Free Press, Akron Beacon-Journal, Miami Herald, 3/16; Chicago News,\n3/15)\n20 condemn Wallace speech opposing proposal; feel Moscow must be grateful\nto\nhim\nand fear Russia will err in thinking U. S. is not behind the President; say no\nsituation in U. S. can be so bad that speech by Wallace won't make it worse;\nuse such captions as \"Singing Soviet Song\", \"Isolationists Folly\", \"Why\nDoesn't\nHe Take Up Boomerangs Again?\" \"No More Munichs, Henry\", \"Why, Henry!\", and\n\"Henry's ¹Agin' It\".\n22 on reaction in Congress.\n3 insist debate should be in order and without wrangling; went the President\ngiven broad discretionary power in using funds; warn against cutting Armed\nServices appropriations below budget requests; hail support of Vandenberg,\nEaton and others.\n6 praise prompt support of Vandenberg; call it outstanding example of placing\npatriotism above partisanship.\n2 find great comfort in prompt endorsement of Sen. Lodge.\n1 approves Flanders resolution to stop shipment of goods to Russia; feels it is\nin line with the President's plan and will help stop Red aggression.\n-3-"
}