Ask the Scholar
Page 3 of 5
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Opposition to proposal (Cont'd)
1 complains of overnight changes in our foreign policy?;points out one month
we ask UN for trusteeship over Pacific islands and next month by-pass UN
in campaign against Russia. (Richmond News-Leader, 3/17)
4 claim possibility of democracy in Greece has already disappeared and
fighting there has already gone the way of Spanish Civil War; wonder if
next step for Uncle Sam will be to become one of Britain's Commonwealth
of Nations; find it "something new for Congress to be directed by a foreign
government as to date and hour when it must legislate in a way to drain the
Treasury of the United States"; contend we should not undertake alone what
UN was set up to do. (Raleigh News & Observer, 3/15, 3/17 & 3/18)
1 reverses position above by insisting Roosevelt kept his 1940 campaign pledge
not to send troops abroad "unless we are attacked"; accuses some Republicans
in present crisis of taking the place of ancient ghouls. (Raleigh News
&
Observer, 3/15)
2 are inclined to agree with John S. Knight of Detroit Free Press in his
opposition to the President's proposal. (Sioux Falls Argus-Leader, 3/15;
Topeka Capital, 3/16)
2 refute opposing arguments of NY Daily Worker; say Moscow and Wallace type
of opposition proves the President right; claim what is bad for Russia
must be good for U. S. (St. Paul Pioneer-Press, 3/14; Wilkes-Barre Times-
Leader, 3/15)
32 on the President acting outside UN.
22 approve, recognizing inability of world organization to handle situation;
blame bungling in setting up UN and properly implementing it; say obligation
to act is clearly ours since we failed to rule power politics out of UN; want
UN utilized now to "greatest feasible extent"; condemn enemies of UN for
criticizing the President; would make his address to Congress not death knell
of UN but new transfusion of life; find most heloful the Vandenberg statement
UN is not ready to act.
6 maintain UN, not the U. S., should decide whether armed intervention is needed
to keep world peace; contend moral backing of community of nations is vital,
even though U. S. would have to contribute most; insist possibility of UN
action should be explored before decision is made by Congress.
4 condemn Truman policy as a death blow to UN and as a risk of bankruptcy
and war for us; quotes formal statements of UN leaders during past two years
to prove unwisdom of the President's proposal; offer six-point fallacy of
our position. (Half-page editorial with cartoons in John S. Knight chain.
Detroit Free Press, Akron Beacon-Journal, Miami Herald, 3/16; Chicago News,
3/15)
20 condemn Wallace speech opposing proposal; feel Moscow must be grateful
to
him
and fear Russia will err in thinking U. S. is not behind the President; say no
situation in U. S. can be so bad that speech by Wallace won't make it worse;
use such captions as "Singing Soviet Song", "Isolationists Folly", "Why
Doesn't
He Take Up Boomerangs Again?" "No More Munichs, Henry", "Why, Henry!", and
"Henry's ¹Agin' It".
22 on reaction in Congress.
3 insist debate should be in order and without wrangling; went the President
given broad discretionary power in using funds; warn against cutting Armed
Services appropriations below budget requests; hail support of Vandenberg,
Eaton and others.
6 praise prompt support of Vandenberg; call it outstanding example of placing
patriotism above partisanship.
2 find great comfort in prompt endorsement of Sen. Lodge.
1 approves Flanders resolution to stop shipment of goods to Russia; feels it is
in line with the President's plan and will help stop Red aggression.
-3-
Page data
- Page
- 3
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 629567bdf7fdde18
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 213875019
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "213875019",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 5,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "213875019",
"label": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "213875019",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Editorial Reaction to Current Issues, Greek Situation, Part II",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 5,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/213875019",
"naId": 213875019,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 22,
"logicalDate": "1947-03-22",
"month": 3,
"year": 1947
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 3,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750296/750296-19-003.jpg",
"mediaId": "629567bdf7fdde18",
"ocrText": "Opposition to proposal (Cont'd)\n1 complains of overnight changes in our foreign policy?;points out one month\nwe ask UN for trusteeship over Pacific islands and next month by-pass UN\nin campaign against Russia. (Richmond News-Leader, 3/17)\n4 claim possibility of democracy in Greece has already disappeared and\nfighting there has already gone the way of Spanish Civil War; wonder if\nnext step for Uncle Sam will be to become one of Britain's Commonwealth\nof Nations; find it \"something new for Congress to be directed by a foreign\ngovernment as to date and hour when it must legislate in a way to drain the\nTreasury of the United States\"; contend we should not undertake alone what\nUN was set up to do. (Raleigh News & Observer, 3/15, 3/17 & 3/18)\n1 reverses position above by insisting Roosevelt kept his 1940 campaign pledge\nnot to send troops abroad \"unless we are attacked\"; accuses some Republicans\nin present crisis of taking the place of ancient ghouls. (Raleigh News\n&\nObserver, 3/15)\n2 are inclined to agree with John S. Knight of Detroit Free Press in his\nopposition to the President's proposal. (Sioux Falls Argus-Leader, 3/15;\nTopeka Capital, 3/16)\n2 refute opposing arguments of NY Daily Worker; say Moscow and Wallace type\nof opposition proves the President right; claim what is bad for Russia\nmust be good for U. S. (St. Paul Pioneer-Press, 3/14; Wilkes-Barre Times-\nLeader, 3/15)\n32 on the President acting outside UN.\n22 approve, recognizing inability of world organization to handle situation;\nblame bungling in setting up UN and properly implementing it; say obligation\nto act is clearly ours since we failed to rule power politics out of UN; want\nUN utilized now to \"greatest feasible extent\"; condemn enemies of UN for\ncriticizing the President; would make his address to Congress not death knell\nof UN but new transfusion of life; find most heloful the Vandenberg statement\nUN is not ready to act.\n6 maintain UN, not the U. S., should decide whether armed intervention is needed\nto keep world peace; contend moral backing of community of nations is vital,\neven though U. S. would have to contribute most; insist possibility of UN\naction should be explored before decision is made by Congress.\n4 condemn Truman policy as a death blow to UN and as a risk of bankruptcy\nand war for us; quotes formal statements of UN leaders during past two years\nto prove unwisdom of the President's proposal; offer six-point fallacy of\nour position. (Half-page editorial with cartoons in John S. Knight chain.\nDetroit Free Press, Akron Beacon-Journal, Miami Herald, 3/16; Chicago News,\n3/15)\n20 condemn Wallace speech opposing proposal; feel Moscow must be grateful\nto\nhim\nand fear Russia will err in thinking U. S. is not behind the President; say no\nsituation in U. S. can be so bad that speech by Wallace won't make it worse;\nuse such captions as \"Singing Soviet Song\", \"Isolationists Folly\", \"Why\nDoesn't\nHe Take Up Boomerangs Again?\" \"No More Munichs, Henry\", \"Why, Henry!\", and\n\"Henry's ¹Agin' It\".\n22 on reaction in Congress.\n3 insist debate should be in order and without wrangling; went the President\ngiven broad discretionary power in using funds; warn against cutting Armed\nServices appropriations below budget requests; hail support of Vandenberg,\nEaton and others.\n6 praise prompt support of Vandenberg; call it outstanding example of placing\npatriotism above partisanship.\n2 find great comfort in prompt endorsement of Sen. Lodge.\n1 approves Flanders resolution to stop shipment of goods to Russia; feels it is\nin line with the President's plan and will help stop Red aggression.\n-3-"
}