Telegram from Ambassador Henry Grady to Secretary of State Dean Acheson, Number 442
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
218719483
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(PSF-SUBT) 324
INCOMING TELEGRAM
Department of State
copy / OF2
TELEGRAPH BRANCH
14-B-X
A
Action
Control:
15586
NEA
Rec'd:
July 30, 1951
FROM: Tehran
10 a.m.
Info
SS
TO:
Secretary of State
DECLASSIFIED
G
EUR
NO:
442, July 30, 3 p.m.
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (r)
981
D.p. of State letter, 4-4-78
E
By NLT.
NO 75
DCR
HK .NARS
NIACT
SENT LONDON (EYES ONLY FOR HARRIMAN AND GIFFORD) 93;
RPTD NIACT DEPT 442.
FOR PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY STATE e (NO DISTRIBUTION IN
DEPT EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY SECRETARY's OFFICE) .
I gave to the Prime Minister early this morning a memo based
on your number 36 July 30. The Prime Minister expressed
surprise and wanted to know, "Then Mr. Harriman finds our
proposal unacceptable?" He said he could not (rpt not)
understand Mr. Harriman's reaction since the Persian reply
said nothing more than he had said to Mr. Harriman. He said,
"Itains now (rpt now) up to Mr. Harriman to tell me where
our formula is not acceptable. Mr. Harriman understood that
we would accept the British mission only on the basis of
the formula and that formula was clearly defined in the min-
ute of the Cabinet minutes with which Mr. Harriman is fami-
liar." The Prime Minister again went over a number of the
points which I made yesterday morning (EMBTEL 90 July 29).
After leaving the Prime Minister, I got in touch with Mr.
Busheri and discussed the whole matter with him. He had
been with the Prime Minister and at once returned after our
conversation. The Prime Minister called a Cabinet meeting
and has just sent for me and given me a note in which he
asked me to ascertain from Mr. Harriman "what sentence in
the Persian reply last night (EMBTEL 91 July 29) has created
difficulty and caused him to think that the HMG does not
(rpt not) facilitate resumption of negotiations. I said
that Mr. Harriman, in his wire to me (EMBTEL London 36). had
suggested that the Iranian Government rephrase its reply
in accordance with suggestion EMBTEL London 33. He felt
that the suggested reply by the Iranian Government was too
simple and abbreviated -- that he thought it most essential
The
that the British understand and accept the Persian formula
with the elaboration in the minute.
BOVER
He said that on the question of tension he feared that this
might be interpreted to include actions which the Iranian
Government
REPRODUCTION OF THIS
MESSAGE IS PROHIBITED
Terms
Relations
belongs_to