Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

CONSIDER THE *RUMANITARIAN" ASPECTS AS WELL, AS SOME OF US INSIST UPON TO. I THINK PERSONALLY THAT INSPITE OF VISHINSKY'S INSISTANCE OF THE *RIGHT* OF FORCED REPETRATIONS, HE MIGHT NOT STICK TO THIS CONDITION IF ONE GIVES HIM SATISFACTION IN OTHER ASPECTS AND FIELDS IN THIS MATTER. AFTER ALL, IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE US, THE USSR WANTS ALSO TO SAVE ITS FACE.. AND ONLY *HONORABLE* SOLUTIONS WOULD BE ACCEPTED BY EITHER USSR OR USA, I MEAN SOLUTIONS WHICH CAN BE WELL JUSTIFIABLE TO THE US AND PRO-COMMUNIST OR COMMUNIST PUBLIC OPINIONS! 4. THE INDIAN DELEGATION HAS WIRED NEW DELHI so THAT THE LATTER WIRES PEKING IN ORDER TO "MAKE THE NECESSARY TALKS" WITH THE RED CHINESE AS TO WHAT EXTENT THE RED CHINESE WOULD BE READY TO ACCEPT THE UNCOMPROMIS- ING ATTITUDE OF THE USSR AND TO WHAT EXTENT WOULD THEY BE READY FOR A COMPROMISE? PALAR OF THE INDONESIAN DELEGATION THEN EXPLAINED HIS RESOLUTION. HE SAID THAT THE RESOLUTION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS WHICH HE THINS RPT THINKS ARE OBJECTIVE AND FAIR: A. THE CONSTITUTION OF 2 COMMISSIONS. THE FIRST ONE WILL BE COMPOSED OF THE "INTERESTED PARTIES" AND ACT ALONG THE SAME LINES THAN THE COMMISSION SUGGESTED BY THE PERUVIAN DELEGATION. WHEN ALL THE PW RPT PW WILL BE GATHERED BY THIS COMMISSION IN A NEUTRAL SPOT -- THEY (THE PW) WOULD BE TOLD TO GO WHEREVER THEY WANT TO GO. THE REMAINING, THOSE WHO HESITATE, WOULD THEN BE TURNED TO A SC RPT SECOND COMMISSION OF *NEUTRALS* WHICH WOULD THEN START TO SCREEN THEM, INTERROGATE THEM, ETC. THE FIRST COMMISSION WILL TAKE ALL THE PW AND WILL NO CONSIDER THE PREVIOUS SCREENING OF THE ALLIES. B. I HAVE CONSULTED WITH THE PERUVIAN AND MEXICAN DELEGATIONS ABOUT MY RESL RPT RESOLUTION AND THEY BOTH THOUGHT IT WAS "HOPEFUL". I INTEND TO HAVE MORE MEETINGS WITH BOTH OF THEM -- BECUASE THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE SUPPORT OF THE SOUTH AMERICANS IS ESSENTIAL TO US. IFHD RPT IF WE CAN GET THE SUPPORT OF BOTH MEXICO AND PERU WITH OTHER SOUTH AMERICANS, THEN OUR RESOLUTION WILL HAVE A GREAT CHANCES TO PASS C. AS FAR AS WHAT WAS SAID BY MR. MENON, SAID PALAR, I DO NOT THINK THAT HIS VIEWS ARE PERFECTLY FIT TO THE SITUATION WHEN HE SPEAKS ABOUT GETTING THE SUPPORT OF BOTH US AND USSR BEFORE PUTTING A RESOLUTION. I SHARE DIFFERENT VIEWS. IF THE RESOLUTION WE RAVE WITH SUFFICIENT CONCESSIONS TO BOTH PARTIES IS CONSIDERED FAIR ENOUGH BY ALL OF US, THEN WE COULD ALWAYS PUSH IT THRU THE COMMITTEE PROVIC RPT PROVIDED WE ARE POSITIVE OR ALMOSTHPOSITIVE OF THE 2/3 MAJORITY UNDER PUBLIC PRESSURE ON BOTH SIDES (USA, USSR), WE CAN HOPE THAT THESE 2 COUNTRIES WILL NOT LOBBY OR REJECT 100 PERCENT SUCH PLAN. MAHMOUD GHALEB OF EGYPT WHO WAS ATTENDING THE MEETING SAID THAT TO HIS MIND -- TWO POINTS SHOULD BE STRESSED OUT: 1. THERE SHOULD BE A GENERAL CALL FOR A CEASE-FIRE BEFORE ANY ACTION IS TAKEN IN REGARD TO THE RETURN OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR. AS LONG AS HOSTILITIES EXIST, SAID GHALEB, THE GENEVA CONVENTION DOES NOT SPEAK ABOUT THE RETURN OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR. WHY NOT PUSHING AMEAD THE

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
d6fc4a7ae6b2a276
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
229036548
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "229036548",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Message from Ashcraft, The Situation in Korea",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Korean War Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "229036548",
    "label": "Message from Ashcraft, The Situation in Korea",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "229036548",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Message from Ashcraft, The Situation in Korea",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Korean War Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 4,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/229036548",
    "naId": 229036548,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 5,
            "logicalDate": "1952-11-05",
            "month": 11,
            "year": 1952
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602194/976111/976111-49-002.jpg",
    "mediaId": "d6fc4a7ae6b2a276",
    "ocrText": "CONSIDER THE *RUMANITARIAN\" ASPECTS AS WELL, AS SOME OF US INSIST\nUPON TO. I THINK PERSONALLY THAT INSPITE OF VISHINSKY'S INSISTANCE\nOF THE *RIGHT* OF FORCED REPETRATIONS, HE MIGHT NOT STICK TO THIS\nCONDITION IF ONE GIVES HIM SATISFACTION IN OTHER ASPECTS AND FIELDS\nIN THIS MATTER. AFTER ALL, IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE US, THE USSR WANTS\nALSO TO SAVE ITS FACE.. AND ONLY *HONORABLE* SOLUTIONS WOULD BE\nACCEPTED BY EITHER USSR OR USA, I MEAN SOLUTIONS WHICH CAN BE WELL\nJUSTIFIABLE TO THE US AND PRO-COMMUNIST OR COMMUNIST PUBLIC OPINIONS!\n4. THE INDIAN DELEGATION HAS WIRED NEW DELHI so THAT THE LATTER WIRES\nPEKING IN ORDER TO \"MAKE THE NECESSARY TALKS\" WITH THE RED CHINESE AS\nTO WHAT EXTENT THE RED CHINESE WOULD BE READY TO ACCEPT THE UNCOMPROMIS-\nING ATTITUDE OF THE USSR AND TO WHAT EXTENT WOULD THEY BE READY FOR A\nCOMPROMISE?\nPALAR OF THE INDONESIAN DELEGATION THEN EXPLAINED HIS RESOLUTION.\nHE SAID THAT THE RESOLUTION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS WHICH HE\nTHINS RPT THINKS ARE OBJECTIVE AND FAIR:\nA. THE CONSTITUTION OF 2 COMMISSIONS. THE FIRST ONE WILL BE COMPOSED\nOF THE \"INTERESTED PARTIES\" AND ACT ALONG THE SAME LINES THAN THE\nCOMMISSION SUGGESTED BY THE PERUVIAN DELEGATION. WHEN ALL THE PW RPT\nPW WILL BE GATHERED BY THIS COMMISSION IN A NEUTRAL SPOT -- THEY\n(THE PW) WOULD BE TOLD TO GO WHEREVER THEY WANT TO GO. THE REMAINING,\nTHOSE WHO HESITATE, WOULD THEN BE TURNED TO A SC RPT SECOND COMMISSION\nOF *NEUTRALS* WHICH WOULD THEN START TO SCREEN THEM, INTERROGATE THEM,\nETC. THE FIRST COMMISSION WILL TAKE ALL THE PW AND WILL NO CONSIDER\nTHE PREVIOUS SCREENING OF THE ALLIES.\nB. I HAVE CONSULTED WITH THE PERUVIAN AND MEXICAN DELEGATIONS\nABOUT MY RESL RPT RESOLUTION AND THEY BOTH THOUGHT IT WAS \"HOPEFUL\".\nI INTEND TO HAVE MORE MEETINGS WITH BOTH OF THEM -- BECUASE THERE IS\nNO DOUBT THAT THE SUPPORT OF THE SOUTH AMERICANS IS ESSENTIAL TO US.\nIFHD\nRPT IF WE CAN GET THE SUPPORT OF BOTH MEXICO AND PERU WITH\nOTHER SOUTH AMERICANS, THEN OUR RESOLUTION WILL HAVE A GREAT CHANCES\nTO PASS\nC. AS FAR AS WHAT WAS SAID BY MR. MENON, SAID PALAR, I DO NOT THINK\nTHAT HIS VIEWS ARE PERFECTLY FIT TO THE SITUATION WHEN HE SPEAKS ABOUT\nGETTING THE SUPPORT OF BOTH US AND USSR BEFORE PUTTING A RESOLUTION.\nI SHARE DIFFERENT VIEWS. IF THE RESOLUTION WE RAVE WITH SUFFICIENT\nCONCESSIONS TO BOTH PARTIES IS CONSIDERED FAIR ENOUGH BY ALL OF US,\nTHEN WE COULD ALWAYS PUSH IT THRU THE COMMITTEE PROVIC RPT PROVIDED\nWE ARE POSITIVE OR ALMOSTHPOSITIVE OF THE 2/3 MAJORITY UNDER\nPUBLIC PRESSURE ON BOTH SIDES (USA, USSR), WE CAN HOPE THAT THESE 2\nCOUNTRIES WILL NOT LOBBY OR REJECT 100 PERCENT SUCH PLAN.\nMAHMOUD GHALEB OF EGYPT WHO WAS ATTENDING THE MEETING SAID THAT TO HIS\nMIND -- TWO POINTS SHOULD BE STRESSED OUT:\n1. THERE SHOULD BE A GENERAL CALL FOR A CEASE-FIRE BEFORE ANY ACTION\nIS TAKEN IN REGARD TO THE RETURN OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR. AS LONG AS\nHOSTILITIES EXIST, SAID GHALEB, THE GENEVA CONVENTION DOES NOT SPEAK\nABOUT THE RETURN OF THE PRISONERS OF WAR. WHY NOT PUSHING AMEAD THE"
}