Memorandum from Admiral Robert Dennison to President Harry S. Truman
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
229036581
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT(PSF-KOREA) 8
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
for OBCDET
18 January 1952
SECURITY INFORMATION
MEMORANDUM FOR:
The President.
Subject:
Korean Armistice Negotiations, Item 3.
Our present negotiating position to prohibit
rehabilitation of airfields in Korea has led to an apparent
impasse. If we assume that a political agreement between our
selves and the communists in Korea may be unobtainable for a
considerable period of time, then it must be clear that the
armistice terms must be realistically related to those things
which can and should be observed over a long term. If we are
to issue a warning as to the serious consequences which will
result from a violation of the armistice, it is all the more
necessary that the terms of an agreed armistice be so stated
that a violation would be clear evidence of renewed aggression
TREMAN
or of aggressive intent.
If the armistice terms include a prohibition
SERVICE"
against airfield rehabilitation, then the armistice would be
technically violated even by minor repairs to a single air-
field. This surely would not be sufficient evidence, even
though it were a violation of the armistice, for us to renew
our military efforts in Korea or to apply military force else-
where in Asia. However, once a violation of the armistice even
in minor degree was accepted by us, the whole agreement would
be weakened and the dividing line between peaceful purpose and
aggressive intent would become dangerously fuzzy instead of
clearly apparent.
The communists have indicated a willingness to
include in the armistice terms some prohibition against the
"increase of air capabilities. The point of air capabilities
goes to the heart of the matter. While it is clear that these
capabilities include airfields, the matter of prohibiting their
rehabilitation is of questionable practicality or merit. In
view of all the above, I believe we have a better chance to
reach an agreement on the principle of no increase in air
capabilities than on our present position which includes pro-
hibition against rehabilitation of fields. Also such an
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (E)
Dept. of State letter, Aug. 15-5-27
PROJECT NUT7-37
By NLT- HC NARS Date 1-18 if
Relations
belongs_to