Ask the Scholar

Page 3 of 6
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 3

OCR

- 3 - State in Palestine would cost the United Nations large sums of money even on the assumption of willing cooperation by Israel and Jordan. The United States delegation, while making clear its support of an international regime for Jerusalem, voted against the Australian resolu- tion for reasons above stated and continued to support the proposal of the Palestine Conciliation Commission which in its view represented a sound basis for a solution, giving substantial recognition to the legiti- mate desires of Israel and Jordan and of the international community. We also emphasized that, although we would consider carefully any proposed amendments to the Palestine Conciliation Commission plan, we could not see our way clear to change our position except in favor of one which represented general agreement. It seems certain that the Arab States supported the Australian resolution out of a desire to oppose Israel and that the Soviet group did so largely in order to block the extension to Arab Palestine of the control of King Abdullah of Jordan, regarded by the Russians as a tool of Great Britain, and to curry favor with the other Arab States. The Vatican, which has important religious interests in Jerusalem, doubtless realized that the Australian resolution could not be implemented, but probably supported it in order to achieve a better bargaining position in respect of Jerusalem. The General Assembly resolution of December 9, 1949 reaffirmed the principle of the 1947 resolution that Jerusalem should be established as a corpus separatum under a special international regime administered by the United Nations. The Trusteeship Council was directed at its next meeting to complete the preparation of the draft Statute for the City,

Page data

Page
3
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
092f23e6d5b1c277
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
269702931
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "269702931",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Secretary of State Dean Acheson to President Harry S. Truman",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "269702931",
    "label": "Memorandum from Secretary of State Dean Acheson to President Harry S. Truman",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "269702931",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Secretary of State Dean Acheson to President Harry S. Truman",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 6,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269702931",
    "naId": 269702931,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 20,
            "logicalDate": "1949-12-20",
            "month": 12,
            "year": 1949
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 3,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750314/750314-01-003.jpg",
    "mediaId": "092f23e6d5b1c277",
    "ocrText": "- 3 -\nState in Palestine would cost the United Nations large sums of money\neven on the assumption of willing cooperation by Israel and Jordan.\nThe United States delegation, while making clear its support of an\ninternational regime for Jerusalem, voted against the Australian resolu-\ntion for reasons above stated and continued to support the proposal of\nthe Palestine Conciliation Commission which in its view represented a\nsound basis for a solution, giving substantial recognition to the legiti-\nmate desires of Israel and Jordan and of the international community.\nWe also emphasized that, although we would consider carefully any proposed\namendments to the Palestine Conciliation Commission plan, we could not\nsee our way clear to change our position except in favor of one which\nrepresented general agreement.\nIt seems certain that the Arab States supported the Australian\nresolution out of a desire to oppose Israel and that the Soviet group\ndid so largely in order to block the extension to Arab Palestine of the\ncontrol of King Abdullah of Jordan, regarded by the Russians as a tool\nof Great Britain, and to curry favor with the other Arab States. The\nVatican, which has important religious interests in Jerusalem, doubtless\nrealized that the Australian resolution could not be implemented, but\nprobably supported it in order to achieve a better bargaining position\nin respect of Jerusalem.\nThe General Assembly resolution of December 9, 1949 reaffirmed the\nprinciple of the 1947 resolution that Jerusalem should be established as\na corpus separatum under a special international regime administered by\nthe United Nations. The Trusteeship Council was directed at its next\nmeeting to complete the preparation of the draft Statute for the City,"
}