Ask the Scholar

Page 4 of 28
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 4

OCR

ONI Review The Ships of the British Navy ment of 42,300 tons and with dimensions of 813 miralty were still adhering to the 35,000-ton stand- this respect these ships are inferior to the Nelson signed speed in excess of 23 knots without sacrificing feet over-all length, a beam of 108 feet and 33 feet ard displacement limit when designing these battle- class and repeat a deficiency common to most older protection. In fact, they might be considered pro- 10 inches draft, Vanguard is the largest and widest ships, they decided in favor of ten 14-inch guns over British battleships. Recent alterations since first totypes of the fast battleship of today. British and capital ship yet built in the British Isles. Her gen- a lesser number of 15 or 16-inch guns. Other fac- commissioning in 1940-42 consisted of removal of foreign naval critics were at one in acclaiming the eral system of protection is stated to be up to stand- tors influencing this decision were reported to be the athwartships fixed catapult, aircraft and aircraft Queen Elizabeth as a masterpiece of marine archi- ard for her tonnage and date of design. The war the availability of the then newly developed 14-inch equipment amidships, increases in the close-defense tecture. Their 1939 modernization included re- somewhat delayed her construction, as she was laid gun, considered to be all-round superior to the A. A. battery, and utilization of the aircraft hangars engining, re-boilering, re-armoring, partial re-arma- down at John Brown & Co., Ltd., Clydebank, on British 15-inch 42 caliber Mark I and all foreign and space between the stacks for additional super- ment and new fire control and damage control sys- October 2, 1941, and not launched until November 14-inch pieces, and the fact that the King George V structure accommodation and boat stowage space. tems. Their former 6-inch casemate secondary bat- 30, 1944. In general arrangement of her design, and her sisters were primarily intended to match The King George V and her sisters are very British tery was entirely removed, the hull built up to upper Vanguard is very similar to the King George V. continental European battleships, in commission or in appearance, their tall, flat-sided funnels being deck level and a new, turreted dual-purpose sec- She has a single rudder. All three anchors have under construction at the time, under prospective strongly reminiscent of Admiral Beatty's famous ondary battery of twenty 4.5 mounted at upper and recessed hawse pipes, which were adopted in this operating conditions in the European theatre. The battle-cruisers of World War I. main deck levels. Their superstructure was entirely ship to reduce difficulties experienced with spray latter requirement called for superior volume of fire Britain's only 16-inch-gun dreadnoughts, Nelson rebuilt, giving them the appearance of a one-funnel in previous vessels. Although originally provided under all visibility conditions. The most radical and Rodney are reported slated for the scrap heap. King George V. The tower bridge, of the type in- for, it was decided during her construction not to innovation in this design was the adoption of the Both saw arduous service in this war, and it is be- troduced in the modernized Warspite in 1937, re- fit aircraft or aircraft equipment. Aircraft han- quadruple turret as a weight-saving expedient; in lieved that they are not considered worth the money placed the old style bridge and tripod foremast; only dling space and hangars aimidships are utilized this the British Navy, which had long favored the required to give them a long overdue major over- light masts are now fitted. As in later battleships, for other purposes. Fitted as a fleet flagship, Van- twin turret and was among the last to adopt the haul. Rodney has already been reduced to a care the heavily armored conning tower was dispensed guard's admiral's and captain's country is placed triple turret, followed the lead of the French. In and maintenance status, while Nelson will serve as with and replaced by a protected battle station, in the after superstructure. general design the King George V class reflect a training ship until relieved by a newer vessel. located just under the open bridge and armored The remaining four modern fast battleships, King typical features of the modern battleship, including They will probably disappear from the navy list with nothing heavier than splinter-proof plating. George V, Anson, Howe, and Duke of York, com- grouping the main battery in a minimum number of within the next year or so. Their design, which has Queen Elizabeth can be distinguished from Valiant prise what is generally known as the King George V turrets, a speed approaching 30 knots, a concentra- been widely publicized since their first commission- by a light tripod mainmast; Valiant has a pole main- class. A fifth unit, Prince of Wales, of Atlantic tion of vitals and superstructure resulting in a rel- ing in 1927, will always be of interest as marking mast. Other particulars are: standard displace- Charter fame, came to an untimely end after a brief atively short armored citadel, and the fitting of a the transition from that of the pre-Jutland capital ment 32,700 tons; over-all length 646 feet; beam, but active career when Japanese torpedo planes turreted dual-purpose secondary battery. With a ship to that of the modern fast battleship. including bulges, 104 feet; draft 33 feet 10 inches; sank her on December 10, 1941, in the South China length of 745 feet, over-all, and a beam of 103 feet, The remaining two battleships are the Queen 80,000 designed horsepower giving the nominal Seas. This class comprises the first group of Brit- they are the narrowest of modern 35,000-ton battle- Elizabeth, nameship of her class, and her sister, ish battleships to be completed since the expiration ships. One reported defect is lack of adequate hull the Valiant. Designed as long ago as 1912, both speed of 24 knots. Both ships will probably be laid of the Washington and London Naval Treaties, and vessels were thoroughly modernized just before the up. One sister ship, the Warspite, underwent sim- flare and freeboard forward, resulting in an ex- may be considered design contemporaries of our tremely wet forecastle and considerable shipping of outbreak of the recent war. They were the world's ilar modernization in 1937. She is scheduled for own North Carolina and Washington. As the Ad- water in rough weather by "A" or No. 1 turret. In first regular dreadnaught battleships to burn all-oil scrapping. Another, the Malaya, exists as a hulk. fuel, to mount the 15-inch-gun and to have a de- The fifth unit of this class, Barham, was sunk by a H. M. S. Duke of York, King George V class fast battleship, showing recent alterations in the amidships super- The old battleship Queen Elizabeth in her present rig. She received her baptism of fire in the Dardanelles cam- structure. The disposition of her ten 14-inch main battery guns is unique among existing capital ships. She paign in 1915, accepted the surrender of the German High Seas Fleet off Scotland in November 1918, and sank the 32,000-ton Scharnhorst in 1943. served in both the European and Far Eastern theaters in this war. 4 Confidential Confidential 5

Page data

Page
4
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
b87e402fe73d0327
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
269703126
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "269703126",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Publication, Office of Naval Intelligence Review",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 28,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "269703126",
    "label": "Publication, Office of Naval Intelligence Review",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "269703126",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Publication, Office of Naval Intelligence Review",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 28,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703126",
    "naId": 269703126,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "logicalDate": "1946-06-01",
            "month": 6,
            "year": 1946
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 4,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-27-004.jpg",
    "mediaId": "b87e402fe73d0327",
    "ocrText": "ONI Review\nThe Ships of the British Navy\nment of 42,300 tons and with dimensions of 813\nmiralty were still adhering to the 35,000-ton stand-\nthis respect these ships are inferior to the Nelson\nsigned speed in excess of 23 knots without sacrificing\nfeet over-all length, a beam of 108 feet and 33 feet\nard displacement limit when designing these battle-\nclass and repeat a deficiency common to most older\nprotection. In fact, they might be considered pro-\n10 inches draft, Vanguard is the largest and widest\nships, they decided in favor of ten 14-inch guns over\nBritish battleships. Recent alterations since first\ntotypes of the fast battleship of today. British and\ncapital ship yet built in the British Isles. Her gen-\na lesser number of 15 or 16-inch guns. Other fac-\ncommissioning in 1940-42 consisted of removal of\nforeign naval critics were at one in acclaiming the\neral system of protection is stated to be up to stand-\ntors influencing this decision were reported to be\nthe athwartships fixed catapult, aircraft and aircraft\nQueen Elizabeth as a masterpiece of marine archi-\nard for her tonnage and date of design. The war\nthe availability of the then newly developed 14-inch\nequipment amidships, increases in the close-defense\ntecture. Their 1939 modernization included re-\nsomewhat delayed her construction, as she was laid\ngun, considered to be all-round superior to the\nA. A. battery, and utilization of the aircraft hangars\nengining, re-boilering, re-armoring, partial re-arma-\ndown at John Brown & Co., Ltd., Clydebank, on\nBritish 15-inch 42 caliber Mark I and all foreign\nand space between the stacks for additional super-\nment and new fire control and damage control sys-\nOctober 2, 1941, and not launched until November\n14-inch pieces, and the fact that the King George V\nstructure accommodation and boat stowage space.\ntems. Their former 6-inch casemate secondary bat-\n30, 1944. In general arrangement of her design,\nand her sisters were primarily intended to match\nThe King George V and her sisters are very British\ntery was entirely removed, the hull built up to upper\nVanguard is very similar to the King George V.\ncontinental European battleships, in commission or\nin appearance, their tall, flat-sided funnels being\ndeck level and a new, turreted dual-purpose sec-\nShe has a single rudder. All three anchors have\nunder construction at the time, under prospective\nstrongly reminiscent of Admiral Beatty's famous\nondary battery of twenty 4.5 mounted at upper and\nrecessed hawse pipes, which were adopted in this\noperating conditions in the European theatre. The\nbattle-cruisers of World War I.\nmain deck levels. Their superstructure was entirely\nship to reduce difficulties experienced with spray\nlatter requirement called for superior volume of fire\nBritain's only 16-inch-gun dreadnoughts, Nelson\nrebuilt, giving them the appearance of a one-funnel\nin previous vessels. Although originally provided\nunder all visibility conditions. The most radical\nand Rodney are reported slated for the scrap heap.\nKing George V. The tower bridge, of the type in-\nfor, it was decided during her construction not to\ninnovation in this design was the adoption of the\nBoth saw arduous service in this war, and it is be-\ntroduced in the modernized Warspite in 1937, re-\nfit aircraft or aircraft equipment. Aircraft han-\nquadruple turret as a weight-saving expedient; in\nlieved that they are not considered worth the money\nplaced the old style bridge and tripod foremast; only\ndling space and hangars aimidships are utilized\nthis the British Navy, which had long favored the\nrequired to give them a long overdue major over-\nlight masts are now fitted. As in later battleships,\nfor other purposes. Fitted as a fleet flagship, Van-\ntwin turret and was among the last to adopt the\nhaul. Rodney has already been reduced to a care\nthe heavily armored conning tower was dispensed\nguard's admiral's and captain's country is placed\ntriple turret, followed the lead of the French. In\nand maintenance status, while Nelson will serve as\nwith and replaced by a protected battle station,\nin the after superstructure.\ngeneral design the King George V class reflect\na training ship until relieved by a newer vessel.\nlocated just under the open bridge and armored\nThe remaining four modern fast battleships, King\ntypical features of the modern battleship, including\nThey will probably disappear from the navy list\nwith nothing heavier than splinter-proof plating.\nGeorge V, Anson, Howe, and Duke of York, com-\ngrouping the main battery in a minimum number of\nwithin the next year or so. Their design, which\nhas\nQueen Elizabeth can be distinguished from Valiant\nprise what is generally known as the King George V\nturrets, a speed approaching 30 knots, a concentra-\nbeen widely publicized since their first commission-\nby a light tripod mainmast; Valiant has a pole main-\nclass. A fifth unit, Prince of Wales, of Atlantic\ntion of vitals and superstructure resulting in a rel-\ning in 1927, will always be of interest as marking\nmast. Other particulars are: standard displace-\nCharter fame, came to an untimely end after a brief\natively short armored citadel, and the fitting of a\nthe transition from that of the pre-Jutland capital\nment 32,700 tons; over-all length 646 feet; beam,\nbut active career when Japanese torpedo planes\nturreted dual-purpose secondary battery. With a\nship to that of the modern fast battleship.\nincluding bulges, 104 feet; draft 33 feet 10 inches;\nsank her on December 10, 1941, in the South China\nlength of 745 feet, over-all, and a beam of 103 feet,\nThe remaining two battleships are the Queen\n80,000 designed horsepower giving the nominal\nSeas. This class comprises the first group of Brit-\nthey are the narrowest of modern 35,000-ton battle-\nElizabeth, nameship of her class, and her sister,\nish battleships to be completed since the expiration\nships. One reported defect is lack of adequate hull\nthe Valiant. Designed as long ago as 1912, both\nspeed of 24 knots. Both ships will probably be laid\nof the Washington and London Naval Treaties, and\nvessels were thoroughly modernized just before the\nup. One sister ship, the Warspite, underwent sim-\nflare and freeboard forward, resulting in an ex-\nmay be considered design contemporaries of our\ntremely wet forecastle and considerable shipping of\noutbreak of the recent war. They were the world's\nilar modernization in 1937. She is scheduled for\nown North Carolina and Washington. As the Ad-\nwater in rough weather by \"A\" or No. 1 turret. In\nfirst regular dreadnaught battleships to burn all-oil\nscrapping. Another, the Malaya, exists as a hulk.\nfuel, to mount the 15-inch-gun and to have a de-\nThe fifth unit of this class, Barham, was sunk by a\nH.\nM. S. Duke of York, King George V class fast battleship, showing recent alterations in the amidships super-\nThe old battleship Queen Elizabeth in her present rig. She received her baptism of fire in the Dardanelles cam-\nstructure. The disposition of her ten 14-inch main battery guns is unique among existing capital ships. She\npaign in 1915, accepted the surrender of the German High Seas Fleet off Scotland in November 1918, and\nsank the 32,000-ton Scharnhorst in 1943.\nserved in both the European and Far Eastern theaters in this war.\n4\nConfidential\nConfidential\n5"
}