Ask the Scholar

Page 6 of 8
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 6

OCR

FRU MAN S. ARCHIVES "NATIONAL SERVICE" RECORDS AND WHY JAPAN SURRENDERED Umezu and Admiral Toyoda argued for a resolute Switzerland on 11 August (west longitude date) prosecution of the war, unless the Allies accepted and immediately broadcast. The foreign office at the three above-mentioned conditions. There Tokyo intercepted it at about noon the same day. was a long discussion of possibilities, ably led by The Byrnes note of 11 August comprised five Baron Hiranuma. Suzuki requested an "imperial pertinent provisions: decision" to break the deadlock, an unprecedented 1. "From the moment of surrender the author- step. The Emperor rose, said that ending the war ity of the Emperor and Japanese government was the only way to relieve Japan from unbear- shall be subject to the Supreme Commander of able distress, and left the room. Suzuki then de- the Allied Powers who will take such steps as he clared: "His Majesty's decision should be made deems proper to effectuate the surrender terms." the decision of this conference as well," and the 2. The Emperor will authorize his government S.C.D.W. adjourned at 0230 August 10. and Imperial General Headquarters to sign the Since an Imperial Conference had no formal surrender and shall command all his armed power to decide anything, a cabinet meeting was forces to lay down their arms. called at about 0300 August 10. There, the im- 3. Immediately upon the surrender the Japa- perial decision was unanimously approved. nese government shall transport prisoners of war At 0700 August 10, a message was sent to the and interned civilians to places of safety where governments of the United States, Great Britain, they can be embarked in Allied transports. the Soviet Union, and China, stating that Japan 4. The ultimate form of the government of was ready to accept the terms of the Potsdam Japan shall be established by the free will of the Declaration with the understanding that the Japanese people. prerogatives of the Emperor as a sovereign ruler 5. Allied occupation forces will remain in were not prejudiced. Japan "until the purposes set forth in the Potsdam During that day the cabinet debated whether to Declaration are achieved." announce this to the public. It was decided to The Byrnes note created new tensions and a make no announcement until after the publica- fresh crisis in high circles at Tokyo. It left no tion of an imperial rescript accepting the Potsdam doubt in anyone's mind that the Japanese would terms, because of the fear of a militarist coup be permitted to retain the Emperor, and most of d'état. That possibility was real indeed. On the the cabinet were for accepting; but Anami, morning of 10 August, War Minister Anami Umezu, and Toyoda were adamant, holding out summoned all officers in Tokyo of the rank of for self-disarmament and a limited occupation or lieutenant colonel and above, told them what had none. A fanatical coup d'état, with the purpose happened, and appealed to them to keep the of continuing the war, was narrowly averted. Army quiet. Increasing restiveness at the war Soon after receipt of the Allied reply, a group of ministry during the day caused him to issue a young Army officers in the War Ministry ap- warning against any overt effort to obstruct the proached Anami with a direct suggestion that the government's decision. And Admiral Yonai issued Army intervene to stop all peace moves. He suc- a comparable warning to the Japanese Navy. ceeded in putting them off, but this powder-keg But the wireless waves and cables between atmosphere persisted while the cabinet for two Tokyo and Washington were working, via Switzer- days longer remained deadlocked. Togo received land. The message of 0700 August 10 accepting support on 13 August in the form of a cablegram the Potsdam Declaration was received at about from the Japanese minister in Stockholm, re- the same hour next day, 10 August, west longitude porting that the United States had resisted strong date. At Washington this created a flurry only pressure from the Soviet Union and China to less agitated than the one at Tokyo. Was it or remove the Emperor. was it not an acceptance of the Potsdam terms? At a conference in the White House between President Truman, Secretaries Byrnes, Stimson, and Forrestal, Admiral Leahy, and a few others, O. N THE eleventh, when the Byrnes note was the question was threshed out. "Terrible political dispatched, President Truman ordered all "stra- repercussions" were anticipated if a promise to tegic" air operations (the B-29s) by the Army Air keep the Emperor on his throne should backfire Force to be suspended; but on the fourteenth, by encouraging the Japanese government to con- apparently with a view to helping the Japanese tinue the war. The President decided, neverthe- make up their minds, the bombers were ordered less, to take the risk, and Secretary Byrnes drafted to resume. That order in turn was canceled after a note in reply to the Japanese offer, which, after more than a thousand B-29s were in the air, but obtaining telegraphed approval from London, most of them were recalled before doing any Moscow, and Chungking, he sent to Tokyo via further damage. 45 Preservation Copy

Page data

Page
6
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
504b7b2ce73e7fed
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
269703272
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "269703272",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Magazine Article, The Atlantic, \"Why Japan Surrendered\" by Samuel Eliot Morison",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "269703272",
    "label": "Magazine Article, The Atlantic, \"Why Japan Surrendered\" by Samuel Eliot Morison",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "269703272",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Magazine Article, The Atlantic, \"Why Japan Surrendered\" by Samuel Eliot Morison",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/269703272",
    "naId": 269703272,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "logicalDate": "1960-10-01",
            "month": 10,
            "year": 1960
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 6,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750315/750315-43-006.jpg",
    "mediaId": "504b7b2ce73e7fed",
    "ocrText": "FRU\nMAN\nS. ARCHIVES \"NATIONAL SERVICE\" RECORDS AND\nWHY JAPAN SURRENDERED\nUmezu and Admiral Toyoda argued for a resolute\nSwitzerland on 11 August (west longitude date)\nprosecution of the war, unless the Allies accepted\nand immediately broadcast. The foreign office at\nthe three above-mentioned conditions. There\nTokyo intercepted it at about noon the same day.\nwas a long discussion of possibilities, ably led by\nThe Byrnes note of 11 August comprised five\nBaron Hiranuma. Suzuki requested an \"imperial\npertinent provisions:\ndecision\" to break the deadlock, an unprecedented\n1. \"From the moment of surrender the author-\nstep. The Emperor rose, said that ending the war\nity of the Emperor and Japanese government\nwas the only way to relieve Japan from unbear-\nshall be subject to the Supreme Commander of\nable distress, and left the room. Suzuki then de-\nthe Allied Powers who will take such steps as he\nclared: \"His Majesty's decision should be made\ndeems proper to effectuate the surrender terms.\"\nthe decision of this conference as well,\" and the\n2. The Emperor will authorize his government\nS.C.D.W. adjourned at 0230 August 10.\nand Imperial General Headquarters to sign the\nSince an Imperial Conference had no formal\nsurrender and shall command all his armed\npower to decide anything, a cabinet meeting was\nforces to lay down their arms.\ncalled at about 0300 August 10. There, the im-\n3. Immediately upon the surrender the Japa-\nperial decision was unanimously approved.\nnese government shall transport prisoners of war\nAt 0700 August 10, a message was sent to the\nand interned civilians to places of safety where\ngovernments of the United States, Great Britain,\nthey can be embarked in Allied transports.\nthe Soviet Union, and China, stating that Japan\n4. The ultimate form of the government of\nwas ready to accept the terms of the Potsdam\nJapan shall be established by the free will of the\nDeclaration with the understanding that the\nJapanese people.\nprerogatives of the Emperor as a sovereign ruler\n5. Allied occupation forces will remain in\nwere not prejudiced.\nJapan \"until the purposes set forth in the Potsdam\nDuring that day the cabinet debated whether to\nDeclaration are achieved.\"\nannounce this to the public. It was decided to\nThe Byrnes note created new tensions and a\nmake no announcement until after the publica-\nfresh crisis in high circles at Tokyo. It left no\ntion of an imperial rescript accepting the Potsdam\ndoubt in anyone's mind that the Japanese would\nterms, because of the fear of a militarist coup\nbe permitted to retain the Emperor, and most of\nd'état. That possibility was real indeed. On the\nthe cabinet were for accepting; but Anami,\nmorning of 10 August, War Minister Anami\nUmezu, and Toyoda were adamant, holding out\nsummoned all officers in Tokyo of the rank of\nfor self-disarmament and a limited occupation or\nlieutenant colonel and above, told them what had\nnone. A fanatical coup d'état, with the purpose\nhappened, and appealed to them to keep the\nof continuing the war, was narrowly averted.\nArmy quiet. Increasing restiveness at the war\nSoon after receipt of the Allied reply, a group of\nministry during the day caused him to issue a\nyoung Army officers in the War Ministry ap-\nwarning against any overt effort to obstruct the\nproached Anami with a direct suggestion that the\ngovernment's decision. And Admiral Yonai issued\nArmy intervene to stop all peace moves. He suc-\na comparable warning to the Japanese Navy.\nceeded in putting them off, but this powder-keg\nBut the wireless waves and cables between\natmosphere persisted while the cabinet for two\nTokyo and Washington were working, via Switzer-\ndays longer remained deadlocked. Togo received\nland. The message of 0700 August 10 accepting\nsupport on 13 August in the form of a cablegram\nthe Potsdam Declaration was received at about\nfrom the Japanese minister in Stockholm, re-\nthe same hour next day, 10 August, west longitude\nporting that the United States had resisted strong\ndate. At Washington this created a flurry only\npressure from the Soviet Union and China to\nless agitated than the one at Tokyo. Was it or\nremove the Emperor.\nwas it not an acceptance of the Potsdam terms?\nAt a conference in the White House between\nPresident Truman, Secretaries Byrnes, Stimson,\nand Forrestal, Admiral Leahy, and a few others,\nO.\nN THE eleventh, when the Byrnes note was\nthe question was threshed out. \"Terrible political\ndispatched, President Truman ordered all \"stra-\nrepercussions\" were anticipated if a promise to\ntegic\" air operations (the B-29s) by the Army Air\nkeep the Emperor on his throne should backfire\nForce to be suspended; but on the fourteenth,\nby encouraging the Japanese government to con-\napparently with a view to helping the Japanese\ntinue the war. The President decided, neverthe-\nmake up their minds, the bombers were ordered\nless, to take the risk, and Secretary Byrnes drafted\nto resume. That order in turn was canceled after\na note in reply to the Japanese offer, which, after\nmore than a thousand B-29s were in the air, but\nobtaining telegraphed approval from London,\nmost of them were recalled before doing any\nMoscow, and Chungking, he sent to Tokyo via\nfurther damage.\n45\nPreservation Copy"
}