Images (7)
Document
| id |
id
269703515
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 7IMMEDIATE RELEASE
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 27, 1952
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
Last Friday night in Detroit, the Republican candidate for
President made a speech discussing the decision to withdraw United
States occupation forces from Korea in 1949. That speech contained
so many misquotations or quotations out of context that it was clearly
an attempt to deceive the American people.
Among other things the candidate sought to create the im-
pression that this decision was made over the objections of the
professional military men of the United States. This is not true.
The professional military men of the United States recommended the de-
cision. General Eisenhower himself was one of the men who recommended
the decision which he now so bitterly criticizes.
Here a re the facts:
1. The text of the Detroit speech of the Republican candidate
for President contains the following statement:
"The terrible record of these years reaches its dramatic
climax in a series of unforgettable scenes on Capitol Hill in June of
1949. By then the decision to complete withdrawal of Americin forces from
Korea -- despite menacing signs from the North -- had been drawn up by
the Department of State. The decision included the intention to ask
Congress for aid to Korea to compensate for the withdrawal of American
forces"
This statement is a combination of falsehood and truth so
interwoven as to create a completely false impression.
It is an attempt to blame the Department of State for a policy
urged by the Department of the Army, a policy which General Eisenhower
"NATIONAL
ARCHIVES AND
himself supported.
RECORDS
The withdrawal of American forces from Korea was proposed
GOVERW
in May 1947 by Secretary of War Robert Patterson, a Republican
(Forrestal, Diary, p. 273).
In Spetember of 1947, the State Department requested the
opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on the maintenance of United States
troops in South Korea. In its request, the Department of State pointed
out that a stalemate had been reached with the Soviet Union over Korea,
and Stated that consideration was being given to what further steps
should be taken to implement United States policy in Korea. In order
that such consideration might include the basic elements, the Department
of State requested, as a matter of urgency, the views of the Joint
Chiefs regarding the interest of the United States in the military
occup ation of Sc. th Korea from the point of view of the military
security of the United States.
The reply of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was transmitted by
the Secretary of Defense, James Forrestal, in a memorandum which he
sent to S cretary of State George Marshall on September 26, 1947.
In this reply the Joint Chiefs of Staff stated that the United States
had little strategic interest in maintaining our troops and bises in
Korea. The reply of the Joint Chiefs went on to explain that our limited
military manpower could be better used elsewhere, and that the withdrawal
of our forces from Korea would not injure the military position of the
Far East Comand unless, as a result, South Korea were used by the Soviets
to build up strength for a major offensive against Japan. They pointed
Relations
belongs_to