Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

TOP SCUTE SEORET DECLASSIFIED E.O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (E) WAR DEPARTMENT OSD letter, April 12, 1974 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF By NLT- H , NARS Date 7-14-7 WASHINGTON 25, D. C. GOLD-1663 October 17, 1946 Dear Mr. President: Since my message of October 10, GOLD-1627, Doctor Stuart has had frequent interviews with Government officials, the leading member of the Democratic League and the leading members of the Young China Party, as well as with nonparty men of prominence. A lengthy message from Shanghai dated October 9 was received by me from General Chou which was transmitted to the Government. It is repeated to you in GOLD-1662. The Generalissimo made a broadcast on the 10th reiterating his standard reasons therefor. As a result of the interviews with Doctor Stuart, a group representative of the leadership in the Democratic League and the Young China Party proceeded to Shanghai with the purpose of conducing General Chou to return to Nanking. Unfortunately at the same time without notice to us the Government issued an official confirmation of the date for the National Assembly, November 12. This aroused strong feeling in all minority parties and made it impossible to persuade General Chou to return to Nanking. The Generalissimo in explanation to Doctor Stuart and me stated that the formal confirmation of the November 12 date was merely a routine procedure, a matter to which he felt no proper objection could be taken. The regulations of the Kuomintang required a formal notification and confirmation one month before the date of meeting. The minority parties on the other hand claimed that this is a matter of great importance to them and an evidence of unilateral and dictatorial action on the part of the Government. Doctor Stuart and I thought the proclamation at that time was tactless, an unnecessary irritation, but it did not appeal to us as a matter of great moment. However leaders of the Democratic League insisted that it was of great moment and we would make a serious tactical error in not considering it as such. Their reasoning stems from an oral discussion and claimed agreement on April 24 between representatives of all the parties and the Generalissimo at the time of the decision to postpone the meeting of assembly scheduled for April 5. Since October 10, Doctor Stuart and I have had frequent interviews with the Generalissimo, which finally resulted last night in the issuance by him of a public statement based on my original proposed statement (see GOLD-1588) with modification by him in the introduction, with additions by me to the conditions or understandings, which in turn the Government modified in part see GOLD-1661). The most serious modification related to the exclusion of Manchuria from the regions in which the Government agreed to settle the question of local government in the State Council. However the Government conceded that the location of troops, Communists and Government alike, would be settled by the Committee of Three and, probably most important of all that the Constitutional Draft Committee would be immediately convened and its draft would be the basis for discussions by the National Assembly. TOP SECRET - 1 -

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
805f3c9e7c46f60b
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
290015603
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "290015603",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from General George C. Marshall to President Harry S. Truman, with Related Note",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Stuart, John Leighton, 1876-1962",
        "Chou, En-lai, 1898-1976"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "290015603",
    "label": "Letter from General George C. Marshall to President Harry S. Truman, with Related Note",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "290015603",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter from General George C. Marshall to President Harry S. Truman, with Related Note",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Stuart, John Leighton, 1876-1962",
        "Chou, En-lai, 1898-1976"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290015603",
    "naId": 290015603,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 17,
            "logicalDate": "1946-10-17",
            "month": 10,
            "year": 1946
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750331/750331-35-002.tif",
    "mediaId": "805f3c9e7c46f60b",
    "ocrText": "TOP SCUTE SEORET\nDECLASSIFIED\nE.O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 5(D) or (E)\nWAR DEPARTMENT\nOSD letter, April 12, 1974\nOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF STAFF\nBy NLT-\nH\n,\nNARS Date 7-14-7\nWASHINGTON 25, D. C.\nGOLD-1663\nOctober 17, 1946\nDear Mr. President:\nSince my message of October 10, GOLD-1627, Doctor Stuart has had\nfrequent interviews with Government officials, the leading member of the\nDemocratic League and the leading members of the Young China Party, as well\nas with nonparty men of prominence. A lengthy message from Shanghai dated\nOctober 9 was received by me from General Chou which was transmitted to the\nGovernment. It is repeated to you in GOLD-1662. The Generalissimo made a\nbroadcast on the 10th reiterating his standard reasons therefor.\nAs a result of the interviews with Doctor Stuart, a group representative\nof the leadership in the Democratic League and the Young China Party proceeded\nto Shanghai with the purpose of conducing General Chou to return to Nanking.\nUnfortunately at the same time without notice to us the Government issued an\nofficial confirmation of the date for the National Assembly, November 12. This\naroused strong feeling in all minority parties and made it impossible to\npersuade General Chou to return to Nanking. The Generalissimo in explanation\nto Doctor Stuart and me stated that the formal confirmation of the November 12\ndate was merely a routine procedure, a matter to which he felt no proper objection\ncould be taken. The regulations of the Kuomintang required a formal notification\nand confirmation one month before the date of meeting. The minority parties on\nthe other hand claimed that this is a matter of great importance to them and an\nevidence of unilateral and dictatorial action on the part of the Government.\nDoctor Stuart and I thought the proclamation at that time was tactless, an\nunnecessary irritation, but it did not appeal to us as a matter of great moment.\nHowever leaders of the Democratic League insisted that it was of great moment\nand we would make a serious tactical error in not considering it as such. Their\nreasoning stems from an oral discussion and claimed agreement on April 24\nbetween representatives of all the parties and the Generalissimo at the time of\nthe decision to postpone the meeting of assembly scheduled for April 5.\nSince October 10, Doctor Stuart and I have had frequent interviews with the\nGeneralissimo, which finally resulted last night in the issuance by him of a\npublic statement based on my original proposed statement (see GOLD-1588) with\nmodification by him in the introduction, with additions by me to the conditions\nor understandings, which in turn the Government modified in part see GOLD-1661).\nThe most serious modification related to the exclusion of Manchuria from the\nregions in which the Government agreed to settle the question of local government\nin the State Council. However the Government conceded that the location of\ntroops, Communists and Government alike, would be settled by the Committee of\nThree and, probably most important of all that the Constitutional Draft Committee\nwould be immediately convened and its draft would be the basis for discussions by\nthe National Assembly.\nTOP SECRET\n- 1 -"
}