Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 5
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

Jewish 1. Plan of Cabinet Committee for the division Palestine into zones radically differs from partition proposal of Royal Commission 1937. Royal Commission proposal contemplated independent and self-governing states. Cabinet Committee a sort of cantonization - provincial government limited powers - un-> democratic - completely subordinated to central government control, meaning British High Commissioner control. 2. Contemplates a narrow zigzagging strip running along three valleys. Reduces the square mile area of the Royal Commission plan, which was already woofully small, by taking away therefrom most of Galilee even though Jewish population has increased by 50% since that time and even though Jewish immigration needs are far more urgent than they ever were in the whole history of the Palestine movement. 3. The plan is neither a federal Palestine plan nor does it contemplate OF pro- vide for self-governing Arab and Jewish provinces - no provision for repre- sentation at the center of the constituent parts. Washington Post of August 2 editorial speaking of the plan "would introduce to Palestine the regime typical of British crown colonies where native chieftains selected by a British Admini- strator and removable by him preside over *district' or 'provinces' which are nominally 'self-governing". 4. On crucial and all-important questions of insigration, ultimate control thereof, notwithstanding the very tiny area of the Jewish province, remains vested in the British administration - again the historically repudiated criterion of the "economic absorptive capacity" of the area = employed - the application of this criterion and the final decision is with the British High Commissioner. This offers no hope, in the light of past experience, for the implementation of the request of the President and the recomendation of the Anglo-American Committee for the transfer of the 100,000 displaced persons or any fractional number thereof. As If the deficiencies of the plan were not already too flagrant to shock the conscience of those interested in achieving some relief for the vic- tims of Nazidom, the proposals, objectionable as they are, make the authori- zation of the 100,000 certificates dependent on Arab consent. "NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE" 5. There is so democratic or autonomous concept involved in a provincial admini- stration - they are completely subordinated to the will of the British High Commissioner and rigitly restricted as to matters with which they are entitled to deal: a) Provincial cabinets appointed by High Commissioner and responsible to him. b) Speaker of provincial legislature appointed by and responsible to High Commissioner, whose powers are broad, including suppression of free discussion. e) High Commissioner's consent required for all provincial legislation. &) Powers of province may be superseded by emergency powers of High Com- missioner e) Provincial courts organized by central British authorities - this applies to the police force in provincial areas.

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
73e42ae03987b5ee
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
290016609
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "290016609",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Attorney General Tom Clark to President Harry S. Truman, with Attachment",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 5,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "290016609",
    "label": "Memorandum from Attorney General Tom Clark to President Harry S. Truman, with Attachment",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "290016609",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Memorandum from Attorney General Tom Clark to President Harry S. Truman, with Attachment",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 5,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/290016609",
    "naId": 290016609,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750342/750342-42-002.tif",
    "mediaId": "73e42ae03987b5ee",
    "ocrText": "Jewish\n1. Plan of Cabinet Committee for the division Palestine into zones\nradically differs from partition proposal of Royal Commission 1937. Royal\nCommission proposal contemplated independent and self-governing states. Cabinet\nCommittee a sort of cantonization - provincial government limited powers - un->\ndemocratic - completely subordinated to central government control, meaning\nBritish High Commissioner control.\n2. Contemplates a narrow zigzagging strip running along three valleys. Reduces\nthe square mile area of the Royal Commission plan, which was already woofully\nsmall, by taking away therefrom most of Galilee even though Jewish population\nhas increased by 50% since that time and even though Jewish immigration needs\nare far more urgent than they ever were in the whole history of the Palestine\nmovement.\n3. The plan is neither a federal Palestine plan nor does it contemplate OF pro-\nvide for self-governing Arab and Jewish provinces - no provision for repre-\nsentation at the center of the constituent parts. Washington Post of August\n2 editorial speaking of the plan \"would introduce to Palestine the regime typical\nof British crown colonies where native chieftains selected by a British Admini-\nstrator and removable by him preside over *district' or 'provinces' which are\nnominally 'self-governing\".\n4. On crucial and all-important questions of insigration, ultimate control thereof,\nnotwithstanding the very tiny area of the Jewish province, remains vested in\nthe British administration - again the historically repudiated criterion of the\n\"economic absorptive capacity\" of the area = employed - the application of this\ncriterion and the final decision is with the British High Commissioner. This\noffers no hope, in the light of past experience, for the implementation of the\nrequest of the President and the recomendation of the Anglo-American Committee\nfor the transfer of the 100,000 displaced persons or any fractional number\nthereof. As If the deficiencies of the plan were not already too flagrant to\nshock the conscience of those interested in achieving some relief for the vic-\ntims of Nazidom, the proposals, objectionable as they are, make the authori-\nzation of the 100,000 certificates dependent on Arab consent.\n\"NATIONAL\nARCHIVES AND\nRECORDS\nSERVICE\"\n5. There is so democratic or autonomous concept involved in a provincial admini-\nstration - they are completely subordinated to the will of the British High\nCommissioner and rigitly restricted as to matters with which they are entitled\nto deal:\na) Provincial cabinets appointed by High Commissioner and responsible\nto him.\nb) Speaker of provincial legislature appointed by and responsible to High\nCommissioner, whose powers are broad, including suppression of free\ndiscussion.\ne) High Commissioner's consent required for all provincial legislation.\n&) Powers of province may be superseded by emergency powers of High Com-\nmissioner\ne) Provincial courts organized by central British authorities - this applies\nto the police force in provincial areas."
}