Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

INTRODUCTION: Among monitored foreign radio broadcasts since the weekend, only Moscow has maintained persistent attention to the State-of-the-Union Message. Previous Soviet "exposures" of its significance are linked to the President's budget proposals--particularly his defense recommendations-which Moscow cites as further evidence "of the reactionary policy at home and the expansionist foreign policy of the ruling circles of the United States." The as yet limited non- Communist foreign radio comment on the budget is also concerned primarily with the defense, and related, recommendations. Most of this comment is favorable; but, as the BBC describes British press reactions, some alarm is expressed over the possibility of a new armaments race. Regarding foreign radio comment about the State Department changes, the most noteworthy fact is Moscow's complete avoidance of such comment on its own responsibility. To date, the Soviet radio has done no more than report the Italian Communist UNITA's interpretation--that Marshall's resignation signifies a "crisis in U.S. foreign policy" which has been marked by "ignominious fiascos," but that it "does not mean that this policy will be changed." THE STATE-OF-THE-UNION MESSAGE: The NEW YORK TIMES reports that Soviet economists recently met to find out why the U.S. has not yet had the predicted economic crisis. Whatever their decision, the Soviet radio sticks to its thesis that Truman revealed "the growing instability of America's economy," that the "American boom, stimulated by a furious armaments race, holds the menace of another even more severe economic crisis," and that the "impasse in which the monopolized U.S. economy has found it- self" is shown by both his State-of-the-Union and budget messages. Moscow also persists in its attempts to puncture "the impression that Truman's message contained the promise of innumerable reforms to increase the well-being of the U.S. people." To this end, it is repeatedly emphasized and elaborated that "the budget... gives priority to military expenditures, (which) is the most characteristic feature of U.S. Government expenditure in recent years." THE BUDGET MESSAGE: Invidious references to American defense and international expenditures have been a constant element of Soviet radio propaganda about the United States. Regarding the President's current budget recommendations, these

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
ef5df2584db4a472
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
470155208
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "470155208",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the State of the Union Message; the President's Budget Message; the State Department Changes",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "470155208",
    "label": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the State of the Union Message; the President's Budget Message; the State Department Changes",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "470155208",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the State of the Union Message; the President's Budget Message; the State Department Changes",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Intelligence Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-001.tif",
    "imageCount": 3,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155208",
    "naId": 470155208,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 12,
            "logicalDate": "1949-01-12",
            "month": 1,
            "year": 1949
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-04-002.tif",
    "mediaId": "ef5df2584db4a472",
    "ocrText": "INTRODUCTION: Among monitored foreign radio broadcasts since the weekend,\nonly Moscow has maintained persistent attention to the State-of-the-Union Message.\nPrevious Soviet \"exposures\" of its significance are linked to the President's\nbudget proposals--particularly his defense recommendations-which Moscow cites as\nfurther evidence \"of the reactionary policy at home and the expansionist foreign\npolicy of the ruling circles of the United States.\" The as yet limited non-\nCommunist foreign radio comment on the budget is also concerned primarily with the\ndefense, and related, recommendations. Most of this comment is favorable; but, as\nthe BBC describes British press reactions, some alarm is expressed over the\npossibility of a new armaments race. Regarding foreign radio comment about the\nState Department changes, the most noteworthy fact is Moscow's complete avoidance\nof such comment on its own responsibility. To date, the Soviet radio has done no\nmore than report the Italian Communist UNITA's interpretation--that Marshall's\nresignation signifies a \"crisis in U.S. foreign policy\" which has been marked by\n\"ignominious fiascos,\" but that it \"does not mean that this policy will be changed.\"\nTHE STATE-OF-THE-UNION MESSAGE: The NEW YORK TIMES reports that Soviet economists\nrecently met to find out why the U.S. has not yet had the predicted economic crisis.\nWhatever their decision, the Soviet radio sticks to its thesis that Truman revealed\n\"the growing instability of America's economy,\" that the \"American boom, stimulated\nby a furious armaments race, holds the menace of another even more severe economic\ncrisis,\" and that the \"impasse in which the monopolized U.S. economy has found it-\nself\" is shown by both his State-of-the-Union and budget messages. Moscow also\npersists in its attempts to puncture \"the impression that Truman's message contained\nthe promise of innumerable reforms to increase the well-being of the U.S. people.\"\nTo this end, it is repeatedly emphasized and elaborated that \"the budget... gives\npriority to military expenditures, (which) is the most characteristic feature of\nU.S. Government expenditure in recent years.\"\nTHE BUDGET MESSAGE: Invidious references to American defense and international\nexpenditures have been a constant element of Soviet radio propaganda about the\nUnited States. Regarding the President's current budget recommendations, these"
}