Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
INTRODUCTION: While the non-Soviet radios no longer comment on Churchill's speech,
there are two monitored reactions from the Soviet sphere. Both consist of the most
vitriolic denunciation. Churchill is described as a "senile man, mad with rage,"
and so thoroughly discredited that President Truman stayed away in order not to
"demonstrate in public his solidarity with Churchill."
"He Regrets Not Having Drowned You as a Baby": A Leipzig (Soviet-controlled)
broadcast by Erika Rowald comments on Churchill's reference to "strangling
Bolshevism at its birth": "Would you, my listeners, believe in the peaceful in-
tentions of a man who tells you that he regrets not having drowned you as a baby
in your bath?" (in Gorman, 2 April)
"President Truman Failed to Appear": Zaslavsky presents on 4 April the first
and as yet the only extended Soviet radio commentary on the speech. In spite of its
length, however, the commentary does not attempt to substantiate, by analysis of
actual quotations from the speech, its accusation that Churchill "demanded" a war
against the Soviet Union; nor is there any reference to Churchill's discussion of
the time factor, or of "the death of the Great Khan." The speech itself is dis-
missed as "not very interesting." While at the time of the Fulton speech "warlike
cynicism was something now and original," now "nobody is amazed or surprised."
"The interesting point lies elsewhere. President Truman was present at
the Fulton speech, but he failed to appear at Boston. The President's
absence could be explained by various important reasons. Maybe among
them is also the fact that Truman did not want to demonstrate in public
his solidarity with Churchill. Does it mean that he does not agree with
Churchill? Nothing of the kind. He agrees, if Churchill can be believed
in this respect. And yet the U.S. Government is trying to persuade the
whole world that the Atlantic Pact is only of a defensive nature and
that it is being concluded only in the interests of peace." (in Polish,
4 April)
Therefore, the broadcast implies, Truman did not want to associate himself
too closely with this "universally hated clown" who is "generally despised" and
whose "own nation repudiates his political leadership."
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 6c4a6c2d2ab7d71c
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 470155236
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "470155236",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Churchill's Boston Speech",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "470155236",
"label": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Churchill's Boston Speech",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "470155236",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to Churchill's Boston Speech",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-001.tif",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155236",
"naId": 470155236,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 5,
"logicalDate": "1949-04-05",
"month": 4,
"year": 1949
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875440/875440-11-002.tif",
"mediaId": "6c4a6c2d2ab7d71c",
"ocrText": "INTRODUCTION: While the non-Soviet radios no longer comment on Churchill's speech,\nthere are two monitored reactions from the Soviet sphere. Both consist of the most\nvitriolic denunciation. Churchill is described as a \"senile man, mad with rage,\"\nand so thoroughly discredited that President Truman stayed away in order not to\n\"demonstrate in public his solidarity with Churchill.\"\n\"He Regrets Not Having Drowned You as a Baby\": A Leipzig (Soviet-controlled)\nbroadcast by Erika Rowald comments on Churchill's reference to \"strangling\nBolshevism at its birth\": \"Would you, my listeners, believe in the peaceful in-\ntentions of a man who tells you that he regrets not having drowned you as a baby\nin your bath?\" (in Gorman, 2 April)\n\"President Truman Failed to Appear\": Zaslavsky presents on 4 April the first\nand as yet the only extended Soviet radio commentary on the speech. In spite of its\nlength, however, the commentary does not attempt to substantiate, by analysis of\nactual quotations from the speech, its accusation that Churchill \"demanded\" a war\nagainst the Soviet Union; nor is there any reference to Churchill's discussion of\nthe time factor, or of \"the death of the Great Khan.\" The speech itself is dis-\nmissed as \"not very interesting.\" While at the time of the Fulton speech \"warlike\ncynicism was something now and original,\" now \"nobody is amazed or surprised.\"\n\"The interesting point lies elsewhere. President Truman was present at\nthe Fulton speech, but he failed to appear at Boston. The President's\nabsence could be explained by various important reasons. Maybe among\nthem is also the fact that Truman did not want to demonstrate in public\nhis solidarity with Churchill. Does it mean that he does not agree with\nChurchill? Nothing of the kind. He agrees, if Churchill can be believed\nin this respect. And yet the U.S. Government is trying to persuade the\nwhole world that the Atlantic Pact is only of a defensive nature and\nthat it is being concluded only in the interests of peace.\" (in Polish,\n4 April)\nTherefore, the broadcast implies, Truman did not want to associate himself\ntoo closely with this \"universally hated clown\" who is \"generally despised\" and\nwhose \"own nation repudiates his political leadership.\""
}