Ask the Scholar
Page 3 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
RESTRICTED
Conservatives and by Seoul newspapers. Soviet and Satellite transmitters
continue to emphasize that recognition represents a serious defeat for
Western imperialism and that it is a sign of the growing conflict within the
imperialist camp. They also discount it on the grounds that it is no real
departure from Britain's traditional "imperialistic course." Madrid, too,
sees recognition as a continuation of Britain's tradition of "Chamberlainian
fence sitting."
On the more positive side, the clandestine VOICE OF VIET NAM expresses
no "great surprise" over the recognition and hopes it will be a "valuable
lesson" to the French. The Swiss radio quotes the liberal GAZETTE DE LAUSANNE
to the effect that recognition may be a sign that Britain is going over to
the offensive in Asia and wants to establish a bridge between East and West.
As do almost all radios, it considers the desire for trade to be Britain's
primary motive but offers, as a secondary aim, the object of "neutralizing
Mao Tse-tung."
AMERICAN RECOGNITION: Speculation about American recognition of Communist
China is just beginning to appear. Warsaw claims that failure to recognize
would be "unreasonable and typical of imperialist blindness." Some non-Soviet
radios point out that the U.S. has not yet had time to assess the situation.
CHINA IN THE U.N.: There has been no monitored attention to the question
of Chinese representation in the United Nations Organization.
RESTRICTED
Page data
- Page
- 3
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- a814e5d57176478c
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 470155355
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "470155355",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement on Formosa and British Recognition of Communist China",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "470155355",
"label": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement on Formosa and British Recognition of Communist China",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "470155355",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Report, Foreign Radio Reactions to the President's Statement on Formosa and British Recognition of Communist China",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Intelligence Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-001.tif",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/470155355",
"naId": 470155355,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 11,
"logicalDate": "1950-01-11",
"month": 1,
"year": 1950
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 3,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602196/875443/875443-05-003.tif",
"mediaId": "a814e5d57176478c",
"ocrText": "RESTRICTED\nConservatives and by Seoul newspapers. Soviet and Satellite transmitters\ncontinue to emphasize that recognition represents a serious defeat for\nWestern imperialism and that it is a sign of the growing conflict within the\nimperialist camp. They also discount it on the grounds that it is no real\ndeparture from Britain's traditional \"imperialistic course.\" Madrid, too,\nsees recognition as a continuation of Britain's tradition of \"Chamberlainian\nfence sitting.\"\nOn the more positive side, the clandestine VOICE OF VIET NAM expresses\nno \"great surprise\" over the recognition and hopes it will be a \"valuable\nlesson\" to the French. The Swiss radio quotes the liberal GAZETTE DE LAUSANNE\nto the effect that recognition may be a sign that Britain is going over to\nthe offensive in Asia and wants to establish a bridge between East and West.\nAs do almost all radios, it considers the desire for trade to be Britain's\nprimary motive but offers, as a secondary aim, the object of \"neutralizing\nMao Tse-tung.\"\nAMERICAN RECOGNITION: Speculation about American recognition of Communist\nChina is just beginning to appear. Warsaw claims that failure to recognize\nwould be \"unreasonable and typical of imperialist blindness.\" Some non-Soviet\nradios point out that the U.S. has not yet had time to assess the situation.\nCHINA IN THE U.N.: There has been no monitored attention to the question\nof Chinese representation in the United Nations Organization.\nRESTRICTED"
}