Ask the Scholar
Page 490 of 506
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
pudiating them. It seems desirable to recommend that a State
repudiating the jurisdiction or decision of the court be sus- -
pended from the enjoyment of the rights inherent to membership
in the international organization.
9. It seems desirable to recommend that the obligation
of the council, in regard to the imposition of the jurisdiction
and decisions of the court, be especially compelling in those
cases in which the court has acted at the suggestion of the
council.
10. In the undertakings of submission to the jurisdiction
of the court, implicitly expressed by the signature of the in-
strument constituting the court, any statement of reservation
should be avoided as far as possible.
If this is unavoidable, such reservations should be limited
to one or two general formulas. In this connection the follow-
ing might be considered admissible:
a.
A reservation in reference to events which
took place before a given date, as, for example,
the beginning of hostilities or the signature
of peace treaties; and
b.
A reservation in reference to relations with
RECEIVE AND
States which may be regarded as not submitting
to the jurisdiction of the court.
11. In regard to the law applicable, the provision of
Article 38 of the statute of the Supreme International Court
of Justice does not give occasion to any fundamental objection.
B. Advisory Opinions
12. The court should be enabled to give advisory opinions
in juridical questions or on juridical points or aspects of
political questions.
13. The following would have the right to petition such
opinions:
a. The Assembly;
b. The Council;
C. The International Organization; and
d. The States in particular, by means of restrictions
assuring the proper use of this right.
581
-42-
Page data
- Page
- 490
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 3b42d36ab6b24a04
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 750266
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "750266",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Dumbarton Oaks Proposals, Comments and Proposed Amendments Concerning: May 7, 1945",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 506,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "750266",
"label": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Dumbarton Oaks Proposals, Comments and Proposed Amendments Concerning: May 7, 1945",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "750266",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: Dumbarton Oaks Proposals, Comments and Proposed Amendments Concerning: May 7, 1945",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 506,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750266",
"naId": 750266,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 490,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750266/750266-01-490.jpg",
"mediaId": "3b42d36ab6b24a04",
"ocrText": "pudiating them. It seems desirable to recommend that a State\nrepudiating the jurisdiction or decision of the court be sus- -\npended from the enjoyment of the rights inherent to membership\nin the international organization.\n9. It seems desirable to recommend that the obligation\nof the council, in regard to the imposition of the jurisdiction\nand decisions of the court, be especially compelling in those\ncases in which the court has acted at the suggestion of the\ncouncil.\n10. In the undertakings of submission to the jurisdiction\nof the court, implicitly expressed by the signature of the in-\nstrument constituting the court, any statement of reservation\nshould be avoided as far as possible.\nIf this is unavoidable, such reservations should be limited\nto one or two general formulas. In this connection the follow-\ning might be considered admissible:\na.\nA reservation in reference to events which\ntook place before a given date, as, for example,\nthe beginning of hostilities or the signature\nof peace treaties; and\nb.\nA reservation in reference to relations with\nRECEIVE AND\nStates which may be regarded as not submitting\nto the jurisdiction of the court.\n11. In regard to the law applicable, the provision of\nArticle 38 of the statute of the Supreme International Court\nof Justice does not give occasion to any fundamental objection.\nB. Advisory Opinions\n12. The court should be enabled to give advisory opinions\nin juridical questions or on juridical points or aspects of\npolitical questions.\n13. The following would have the right to petition such\nopinions:\na. The Assembly;\nb. The Council;\nC. The International Organization; and\nd. The States in particular, by means of restrictions\nassuring the proper use of this right.\n581\n-42-"
}