Ask the Scholar

Page 187 of 436
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 187

OCR

J. 333305-MONO-State Galley 186 UNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF British policy envisages the retention, during the occupation period, of as large a part of the existing organization and structure of the German economy as is compatible with the destruction of the Nazi regime. The main elements of the present machinery of economic control would, so far as conditions permit, be held together after eliminating their discriminatory, Nazi feature; the existing executive and managerial personnel of private industry would continue in their positions, after removal of active Nazis who had held govern- mental or party posts. The aims of this policy are to prevent eco- nomic breakdown and to preserve a situation in which control over the economy can be exercised. One important British objective in controlling the German eco- nomy is to limit German competition with British exports. In relation to this objective Britain's interest as a reparation claimant is distinctly secondary. Britain's program for accomplishing this objective is, however, moderate and restrained, relying primarily upon controls rather than upon basic economic impairment of Germany. There have been no proposals, even from the "hard peace" group, for elimina- tion of German heavy industry, since Britain would necessarily have to bear the chief onus for enforcement of such a policy. Apart from specialized facilities for the manufacture of land and naval armament and all types of aircraft, the British are apparently considering dis- mantling of productive facilities in only a few other industries, such as synthetic oil and rubber. Destruction of a few such industries would neither significantly weaken the German economy nor lengthen appreciably the time required for war preparation if enforcement of disarmament broke down. Such destruction would, however, restore the German market for important British products. Britain is also prepared to support a program of restitution and of reparation in kind, confined to a specified list of export commodities, but is justi- fiably interested in preventing Germany from getting a head start, through reparation, in export markets of crucial importance to the British. Britain appears to envisage a continuation of certain indirect con- trols over the German economy, primarily through exports and imports, beyond the period of military government. Such controls, although proposed partly as a means of enforcing disarmament, are also desired as a method of regulating German competition. A leading British industrialist has suggested that in the long run this problem of restraining German competition might best be handled through cartel-type arrangements with German industry on terms which would assure British goods a larger share of common markets than before the war but would still leave Germany sufficient export opportunities to meet her essential requirements. Russian policy seems to envisage removal from positions of control of most industrialists and large landowners. The legal basis for such action is provided in the Russian declaration that Germans who employed Russian labor are war criminals. This will open the way for designation of new managers to operate under direction of the occupation authority. While the British look to the retention of much of the existing organization and personnel as a means of exercising control over the German economy, the Soviet Union intends to effect its control by selection of new German personnel for

Page data

Page
187
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
a5a9e2948c3bff2e
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
750433
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "750433",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 436,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "750433",
    "label": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "750433",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 436,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "naId": 750433,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 187,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-187.jpg",
    "mediaId": "a5a9e2948c3bff2e",
    "ocrText": "J. 333305-MONO-State\nGalley 186\nUNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF\nBritish policy envisages the retention, during the occupation\nperiod, of as large a part of the existing organization and structure\nof the German economy as is compatible with the destruction of the\nNazi regime. The main elements of the present machinery of economic\ncontrol would, so far as conditions permit, be held together after\neliminating their discriminatory, Nazi feature; the existing executive\nand managerial personnel of private industry would continue in\ntheir positions, after removal of active Nazis who had held govern-\nmental or party posts. The aims of this policy are to prevent eco-\nnomic breakdown and to preserve a situation in which control over\nthe economy can be exercised.\nOne important British objective in controlling the German eco-\nnomy is to limit German competition with British exports. In relation\nto this objective Britain's interest as a reparation claimant is distinctly\nsecondary. Britain's program for accomplishing this objective is,\nhowever, moderate and restrained, relying primarily upon controls\nrather than upon basic economic impairment of Germany. There\nhave been no proposals, even from the \"hard peace\" group, for elimina-\ntion of German heavy industry, since Britain would necessarily have\nto bear the chief onus for enforcement of such a policy. Apart from\nspecialized facilities for the manufacture of land and naval armament\nand all types of aircraft, the British are apparently considering dis-\nmantling of productive facilities in only a few other industries, such\nas synthetic oil and rubber. Destruction of a few such industries would\nneither significantly weaken the German economy nor lengthen\nappreciably the time required for war preparation if enforcement of\ndisarmament broke down. Such destruction would, however, restore\nthe German market for important British products. Britain is also\nprepared to support a program of restitution and of reparation in\nkind, confined to a specified list of export commodities, but is justi-\nfiably interested in preventing Germany from getting a head start,\nthrough reparation, in export markets of crucial importance to the\nBritish.\nBritain appears to envisage a continuation of certain indirect con-\ntrols over the German economy, primarily through exports and\nimports, beyond the period of military government. Such controls,\nalthough proposed partly as a means of enforcing disarmament, are\nalso desired as a method of regulating German competition. A leading\nBritish industrialist has suggested that in the long run this problem\nof restraining German competition might best be handled through\ncartel-type arrangements with German industry on terms which would\nassure British goods a larger share of common markets than before\nthe war but would still leave Germany sufficient export opportunities\nto meet her essential requirements.\nRussian policy seems to envisage removal from positions of control\nof most industrialists and large landowners. The legal basis for such\naction is provided in the Russian declaration that Germans who\nemployed Russian labor are war criminals. This will open the way\nfor designation of new managers to operate under direction of the\noccupation authority. While the British look to the retention of\nmuch of the existing organization and personnel as a means\nof\nexercising control over the German economy, the Soviet Union\nintends to effect its control by selection of new German personnel for"
}