Ask the Scholar

Page 96 of 436
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 96

OCR

J. 333305MONO-State Galley 95 UNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF tion indicating that the British position now coincides with the Soviet position. 4. Recommended alternative American position. In the event that it should prove impossible to obtain the agree- ment of both the Soviet and the British Governments to our preferred position, it is recommended that we reluctantly accept the unqualified principle of unanimity of permanent members in both categories of procedures, provided this rule is explicitly adopted only as a provisional and temporary measure. The duration of such a measure might be (1) for a fixed number of years, or (2) subject to reconsideration by the Council after a fixed number of years, or (3) for such time as the pres- ent number and distribution of permanent seats on the Council con- tinue. It is believed that such a frankly temporary and provisional arrangement would not be in violation of our principles and, if neces- sary to obtain establishment of the organization, would be acceptable to public opinion in this country and elsewhere. Matthews Files The Director of the Office of European Affairs (Dunn) to the Under Secretary of State (Stettinius) I 1 Carbon copy. [WASHINGTON,] November 10, 1944. MEMORANDUM 2 PREPARATION FOR Big THREE MEETING 2 For other excerpts from this memorandum, see post, pp. - ff. 3. The questions having to do with the International Organization I shall leave to Leo,³ but I just want to add my word that if the 3 Leo Pasvolsky, Special Assistant to the Secretary of State. Russians remain absolutely adamant on the subject of demanding a veto to cover all of Section A of Chapter 84 as well as Section B, I 4 Of the Dumbarton Oaks Proposals. think it would be advisable to postpone any meeting of the United Nations for the present, because I just cannot see the United States taking the position of presenting the other United Nations with a proposal of that kind. In the first place, I do not believe that we would have many of the other nations join the organization and if they did so, would do it with a bad grace and would thus gravely injure the whole basic spirit of the organization, which is to be built on the foundation of friendly international cooperation, if it is ever to be a success. I could go on with the Russians in their demand for veto power as it applies to Section B of Chapter 8, and I think it would be a sound position for this Government to take and would be well received by the American people, but if the Russians will not accept a compromise position, then I would propose that all of Section A be completely eliminated from the proposals and that we accept the Russian position with regard to Section B, that is, enforcement action, as Section B is now written.

Page data

Page
96
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
72c9cff6d38957d3
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
750433
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "750433",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 436,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "750433",
    "label": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "750433",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part I)",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 436,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750433",
    "naId": 750433,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 96,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750433/750433-01-096.jpg",
    "mediaId": "72c9cff6d38957d3",
    "ocrText": "J. 333305MONO-State\nGalley\n95\nUNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF\ntion indicating that the British position now coincides with the Soviet\nposition.\n4. Recommended alternative American position.\nIn the event that it should prove impossible to obtain the agree-\nment of both the Soviet and the British Governments to our preferred\nposition, it is recommended that we reluctantly accept the unqualified\nprinciple of unanimity of permanent members in both categories of\nprocedures, provided this rule is explicitly adopted only as a provisional\nand temporary measure. The duration of such a measure might be\n(1) for a fixed number of years, or (2) subject to reconsideration by the\nCouncil after a fixed number of years, or (3) for such time as the pres-\nent number and distribution of permanent seats on the Council con-\ntinue. It is believed that such a frankly temporary and provisional\narrangement would not be in violation of our principles and, if neces-\nsary to obtain establishment of the organization, would be acceptable\nto public opinion in this country and elsewhere.\nMatthews Files\nThe Director of the Office of European Affairs (Dunn) to the Under\nSecretary of State (Stettinius) I\n1 Carbon copy.\n[WASHINGTON,] November 10, 1944.\nMEMORANDUM\n2\nPREPARATION FOR Big THREE MEETING\n2 For other excerpts from this memorandum, see post, pp. - ff.\n3. The questions having to do with the International Organization\nI shall leave to Leo,³ but I just want to add my word that if the\n3 Leo Pasvolsky, Special Assistant to the Secretary of State.\nRussians remain absolutely adamant on the subject of demanding a\nveto to cover all of Section A of Chapter 84 as well as Section B, I\n4 Of the Dumbarton Oaks Proposals.\nthink it would be advisable to postpone any meeting of the United\nNations for the present, because I just cannot see the United States\ntaking the position of presenting the other United Nations with a\nproposal of that kind. In the first place, I do not believe that we\nwould have many of the other nations join the organization and if\nthey did so, would do it with a bad grace and would thus gravely\ninjure the whole basic spirit of the organization, which is to be built\non the foundation of friendly international cooperation, if it is ever\nto\nbe\na success. I could go on with the Russians in their demand for\nveto power as it applies to Section B of Chapter 8, and I think it\nwould be a sound position for this Government to take and would be\nwell received by the American people, but if the Russians will not\naccept a compromise position, then I would propose that all of Section\nA be completely eliminated from the proposals and that we accept the\nRussian position with regard to Section B, that is, enforcement action,\nas Section B is now written."
}