Ask the Scholar
Page 348 of 410
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
J. 333305MONO-State
Galley 774
UNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF
frontier going as far as W. Neisse because they think the problem is
larger than we could manage.
Pres: We should rather hear from the Pol. Govt of Nat. Unity.
We had better leave out all references to boundaries.
Church: On West?
Maisky: On East we should say something.
Church: Agreed. People will immediately say what is the position
about the frontier. We think E. frontier is settled. We think on
W. frontier wishes of Pol Govt Nat Un be first consulted and matter
finally settled at peace settlements.
Pres: I cannot agree on Pol boundaries at this time. It must be
done by the Sen later.
Mol: It would be very good if something could be said about full
agt of 3 heads about E. frontier. Would clarify that important q.
It would be good to say gen. opin of all sides represented. Prob.
would provoke criticism for a time but in end would be good. Proposes
leave it to 3 Mins. to find nec. formula. Not nec. to say anything
about W. frontier.
Church: Something.
Mol: Yes, much less def.
Church: Say recog by 3 powers Pol should receive substantial ac-
cession of terr both to the n. and to the W.
1
Thereafter final line
be determined.
1 Points appear in the original.
St: That would be very good. That would correspond to wish of
public opin. all around.
Pres: 3 For Secs.
Church: Along lines we have suggested.
St: As a last 1
Ed: Decl. on Lib Areas (continuing his report)-read and Church
amended the Mol. amend. to include "responsibilities" etc.
Mol: Wants his amend. to stand.
Pres: Read it as agreed this morning.
Church: How can you carry out measure.
St. accepted Church. formula.
Agreed to be put in language.
Document approved.
Ed: Amend. re Fr.-"In issuing this decl. the 3 powers express the
hope that the French Prov. Govt will be associated with them in the
action and procedures contemplated."
Pres: I have rather changed my opin. I was opposed to Fr. sitting
in on the Com. of 3, Control Machinery. The more I think of it the
more I think the PM's contention that a country which has an area
to control cannot do so without sitting in on the Con. Com. I think
it would be easier if Fr. is on that Con. Com. to get DeG to agree to
this Decl. and other things. Like St. think about it.
Pres agreed to Ed. addition.
St agreed.
Ed: Yug.
Agreed For Mins. prepare first draft final communique.
Pres: Should communique contain Yug statement. Will leave to
Ed in Conf. with For Mins whether we join in on that or not.
Church: There are very respectable issues.
Page data
- Page
- 348
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 3142619f56957764
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 750434
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "750434",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part II)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 410,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "750434",
"label": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part II)",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "750434",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Foreign Affairs File, 1940-1953: \"Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945\" (galley proofs, Part II)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434",
"collections": [
"President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
"Subject Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-001.jpg",
"imageCount": 410,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/750434",
"naId": 750434,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 348,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-psf/602191/750434/750434-01-348.jpg",
"mediaId": "3142619f56957764",
"ocrText": "J. 333305MONO-State\nGalley 774\nUNCORRECTED GALLEY PROOF\nfrontier going as far as W. Neisse because they think the problem is\nlarger than we could manage.\nPres: We should rather hear from the Pol. Govt of Nat. Unity.\nWe had better leave out all references to boundaries.\nChurch: On West?\nMaisky: On East we should say something.\nChurch: Agreed. People will immediately say what is the position\nabout the frontier. We think E. frontier is settled. We think on\nW. frontier wishes of Pol Govt Nat Un be first consulted and matter\nfinally settled at peace settlements.\nPres: I cannot agree on Pol boundaries at this time. It must be\ndone by the Sen later.\nMol: It would be very good if something could be said about full\nagt of 3 heads about E. frontier. Would clarify that important q.\nIt would be good to say gen. opin of all sides represented. Prob.\nwould provoke criticism for a time but in end would be good. Proposes\nleave it to 3 Mins. to find nec. formula. Not nec. to say anything\nabout W. frontier.\nChurch: Something.\nMol: Yes, much less def.\nChurch: Say recog by 3 powers Pol should receive substantial ac-\ncession of terr both to the n. and to the W.\n1\nThereafter final line\nbe determined.\n1 Points appear in the original.\nSt: That would be very good. That would correspond to wish of\npublic opin. all around.\nPres: 3 For Secs.\nChurch: Along lines we have suggested.\nSt: As a last 1\nEd: Decl. on Lib Areas (continuing his report)-read and Church\namended the Mol. amend. to include \"responsibilities\" etc.\nMol: Wants his amend. to stand.\nPres: Read it as agreed this morning.\nChurch: How can you carry out measure.\nSt. accepted Church. formula.\nAgreed to be put in language.\nDocument approved.\nEd: Amend. re Fr.-\"In issuing this decl. the 3 powers express the\nhope that the French Prov. Govt will be associated with them in the\naction and procedures contemplated.\"\nPres: I have rather changed my opin. I was opposed to Fr. sitting\nin on the Com. of 3, Control Machinery. The more I think of it the\nmore I think the PM's contention that a country which has an area\nto control cannot do so without sitting in on the Con. Com. I think\nit would be easier if Fr. is on that Con. Com. to get DeG to agree to\nthis Decl. and other things. Like St. think about it.\nPres agreed to Ed. addition.\nSt agreed.\nEd: Yug.\nAgreed For Mins. prepare first draft final communique.\nPres: Should communique contain Yug statement. Will leave to\nEd in Conf. with For Mins whether we join in on that or not.\nChurch: There are very respectable issues."
}