Ask the Scholar

Page 16 of 95
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 16

OCR

USE OF RELIGION IN SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY Religion is one of the major instruments employed by Orthodoxy today lies in the national churches, backed and the Soviet Union to intensify domestic control over her controlled by national governments, rather than in the old heterogeneous peoples, to strengthen her hold on currently Patriarchates, (d) located in areas which have been con- Soviet-dominated areas, and to further Soviet penetra- trolled by Moslem rulers for centuries. Until the end of tion in other regions.19 More specifically, the U. S. S. R. World War I, the strongest of these national churches was hopes to use the Orthodox and related faiths 20 to: (1) the Russian Orthodox Church. encourage loyalty to the Soviet regime among the Ortho- In 1589 the Russian Orthodox Church, backed by the dox in Russia (2) bring within the fold of the Russian growing power of the Muskovite princes, forced the Church autonomous (a) and semi-autonomous Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Jeremias II to recognize the See of and Eastern Catholic organizations existing in bordering Moscow as having Patriarchal powers over the Russian countries; and (3) combat on an international scale the Orthodox Church. Simultaneously with the development anti-Communist influence of the Vatican. of Russia as a major Power, the theory was developed by These steps are designed to make the Moscow Patri- Russian mystics that Moscow was the "Holy City of archate the actual, if not the theoretical, center of Ortho- God"-the third Rome.22 doxy (b) and to regain for the Soviet state the position of The independence of the Russian Church from the juris- the Russian Empire as the protector of Orthodoxy in diction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople general. resulted in its complete subjection to the Czarist Govern- ment. This relationship prevailed from 1721 until the Soviet Political Aims and the Orthodox Church Revolution, after which the ideology of the Soviet regime The political significance of increasingly cordial rela- prevented the Church from functioning freely. Despite tions between the. Soviet Government and the Russian the Soviet attitude toward religion, Metropolitan Sergi Orthodox Church lies in the intention of Soviet leaders to of Novgorod, acting Patriarch 1925-1943, recognizing that use the prestige of an Eastern (°) Eastern Orthodox a major function of a national church was to support the Church to increase Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, the established national authority, followed a policy of cooper- Middle East, and in areas which have been centers of Rus- ation with the social program of the Soviet Government. sian Orthodox emigration since the Revolution. Such Sincere support of government policy, particularly during centers include North America, various Chinese and Man- the war, and the reduced strength of the Orthodox Church churian coastal cities, and France. in the U. S. S. R. resulting from the Soviet suppression, apparently convinced the Soviet leaders that they have The Russian Orthodox Church nothing to fear from the Church, but, on the contrary, that The Eastern Churches, both Orthodox 21 and heretical, considerable political gain will result from encouraging are organized along national lines, and the strength of church activities at home and abroad. The Soviet leaders, therefore, have conceded the church a considerable measure 19 See map, page 36. of governmental support. 20 See chart, page 38, for organization of the Christian Churches In September 1943 the government created the Council of the East. on Orthodox Church Affairs and attached it to the Soviet (a) (b) See Glossary, page 39. of People's Commissars to supervise relations between the 21 The Orthodox Church is the technical name given to that body Orthodox Church and the Soviet Government. The same of Christians who use the Byzantine (e) rite, in various languages, in their church ceremonies. The Orthodox Church has been in year the government permitted the formal appointment schism with the Papacy since 1054 and is in union with the Ecu- of Metropolitan Sergei to the Patriarchal office which he menical (¹) Patriarchate of Constantinople (Istanbul). Orthodox Christians recognize the technical primacy of the Patriarch of 22 The second Rome was Constantinople, which became a Patri- Istanbul-whose relation to the other Patriarchs of the auto- archate in 381 A. D., Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria being the initial cephalous (8) and autonomous Orthodox Churches is defined as Christian Sees. Constantinople was called Czargrad by the Rus- "first among his equals." sians prior to its falls to the Turks in 1453. (°) (¹) (8 See Glossary, page 39. () See Glossary, page 39. RESTRICTE 35

Page data

Page
16
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
4f54b4dc639cc7c2
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7788604
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7788604",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "War Department Report, The Soviet Union",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Cold War",
        "International relations",
        "United States-Soviet relations"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "imageCount": 95,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7788604",
    "label": "War Department Report, The Soviet Union",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7788604",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "War Department Report, The Soviet Union",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604",
    "collections": [
        "President's Secretary's Files (Truman Administration)",
        "Subject Files"
    ],
    "subjects": [
        "Cold War",
        "International relations",
        "United States-Soviet relations"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-93.jpg",
    "imageCount": 95,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7788604",
    "naId": 7788604,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "logicalDate": "1948-01-01",
            "year": 1948
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 16,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/4/7886/7788604/content/presidential-libraries/truman/602191/750715/hst-psf_750715_02-36.jpg",
    "mediaId": "4f54b4dc639cc7c2",
    "ocrText": "USE OF RELIGION IN SOVIET\nFOREIGN POLICY\nReligion is one of the major instruments employed by\nOrthodoxy today lies in the national churches, backed and\nthe Soviet Union to intensify domestic control over her\ncontrolled by national governments, rather than in the old\nheterogeneous peoples, to strengthen her hold on currently\nPatriarchates, (d) located in areas which have been con-\nSoviet-dominated areas, and to further Soviet penetra-\ntrolled by Moslem rulers for centuries. Until the end of\ntion in other regions.19 More specifically, the U. S. S. R.\nWorld War I, the strongest of these national churches was\nhopes to use the Orthodox and related faiths 20 to: (1)\nthe Russian Orthodox Church.\nencourage loyalty to the Soviet regime among the Ortho-\nIn 1589 the Russian Orthodox Church, backed by the\ndox in Russia (2) bring within the fold of the Russian\ngrowing power of the Muskovite princes, forced the\nChurch autonomous (a) and semi-autonomous Orthodox\nEcumenical Patriarch Jeremias II to recognize the See of\nand Eastern Catholic organizations existing in bordering\nMoscow as having Patriarchal powers over the Russian\ncountries; and (3) combat on an international scale the\nOrthodox Church. Simultaneously with the development\nanti-Communist influence of the Vatican.\nof Russia as a major Power, the theory was developed by\nThese steps are designed to make the Moscow Patri-\nRussian mystics that Moscow was the \"Holy City of\narchate the actual, if not the theoretical, center of Ortho-\nGod\"-the third Rome.22\ndoxy (b) and to regain for the Soviet state the position of\nThe independence of the Russian Church from the juris-\nthe Russian Empire as the protector of Orthodoxy in\ndiction of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople\ngeneral.\nresulted in its complete subjection to the Czarist Govern-\nment. This relationship prevailed from 1721 until the\nSoviet Political Aims and the Orthodox Church\nRevolution, after which the ideology of the Soviet regime\nThe political significance of increasingly cordial rela-\nprevented the Church from functioning freely. Despite\ntions between the. Soviet Government and the Russian\nthe Soviet attitude toward religion, Metropolitan Sergi\nOrthodox Church lies in the intention of Soviet leaders to\nof Novgorod, acting Patriarch 1925-1943, recognizing that\nuse the prestige of an Eastern (°) Eastern Orthodox\na major function of a national church was to support the\nChurch to increase Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, the\nestablished national authority, followed a policy of cooper-\nMiddle East, and in areas which have been centers of Rus-\nation with the social program of the Soviet Government.\nsian Orthodox emigration since the Revolution. Such\nSincere support of government policy, particularly during\ncenters include North America, various Chinese and Man-\nthe war, and the reduced strength of the Orthodox Church\nchurian coastal cities, and France.\nin the U. S. S. R. resulting from the Soviet suppression,\napparently convinced the Soviet leaders that they have\nThe Russian Orthodox Church\nnothing to fear from the Church, but, on the contrary, that\nThe Eastern Churches, both Orthodox 21 and heretical,\nconsiderable political gain will result from encouraging\nare organized along national lines, and the strength of\nchurch activities at home and abroad. The Soviet leaders,\ntherefore, have conceded the church a considerable measure\n19 See map, page 36.\nof governmental support.\n20 See chart, page 38, for organization of the Christian Churches\nIn September 1943 the government created the Council\nof the East.\non Orthodox Church Affairs and attached it to the Soviet\n(a) (b) See Glossary, page 39.\nof People's Commissars to supervise relations between the\n21 The Orthodox Church is the technical name given to that body\nOrthodox Church and the Soviet Government. The same\nof Christians who use the Byzantine (e) rite, in various languages,\nin their church ceremonies. The Orthodox Church has been in\nyear the government permitted the formal appointment\nschism with the Papacy since 1054 and is in union with the Ecu-\nof Metropolitan Sergei to the Patriarchal office which he\nmenical (¹) Patriarchate of Constantinople (Istanbul). Orthodox\nChristians recognize the technical primacy of the Patriarch of\n22 The second Rome was Constantinople, which became a Patri-\nIstanbul-whose relation to the other Patriarchs of the auto-\narchate in 381 A. D., Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria being the initial\ncephalous (8) and autonomous Orthodox Churches is defined as\nChristian Sees. Constantinople was called Czargrad by the Rus-\n\"first among his equals.\"\nsians prior to its falls to the Turks in 1453.\n(°) (¹) (8 See Glossary, page 39.\n() See Glossary, page 39.\nRESTRICTE\n35"
}