Letters from Robert N. Golding to Edwin L. Weisl, Roy J. Bullock, and Arthur M. Cox
Images (4)
Document
| id |
id
189704351
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4offer
April 28, 1960
Dear Ed,
It's been a long time since we've had any contact but you know (I hope) that
I'm not a screwball who goes off half-cocked, so I can get down to business without
the customary preliminary palaver and apology for what may be a long letter.
The enclosed book is loaned, not given, to you since it is my last available
copy and I'll appreciate its return after you have read it. The Foreword (9 pages)
will, I'm sure, convince you that a "theory of the case" which has produced correct
predictions over a twenty year period must be right - mere good luck would not
have lasted that long. There are other predictions, in later chapters, which have
come true since the book was written, and these buttress that belief.
Our national trouble has been that American basic thinking has been wrong and
needs to be changed. The reason for losses is not the incompetence of individuals
who have had charge of this or that, so we cannot hope for better things if men
only be changed. A wrong "theory of the case" will result in failure no matter
who operates it. As a former trial lawyer you know that.
For years we have been fighting mere agents - *international communism".
fanatics, dogmatists, groups of American punks *conspiring" in cellars, and the
like. Our enemy is none of that, which is new - only forty years old - and
hence
a strange and mysterious something which frightens too many. The enemy is the
Great Khanate which periodically has come to life over 1,500 years with devastating
effect. Why?
The reason is that Western Civilization has always refused to learn the enemy's
principles of war and operating methods, insisting on devotedly following our ovn
"heads bloody but unbowed" ideas which we have inherited from the noble knights.
They never even won a battle - and our record is not much better. This can be
changed.
If, however, the next President is to be anything but the American Romulus
Augustulus we must cease thinking defensively in terms of heroic patriots dying
bravely while repelling the invader and we must learn to attack with non-shooting
weapons in the present phase, which is not peace at all but the non-shooting phase
of World War III. This has been going on for over ten years already, but most
Americans do not even know that there is such a thing as non-shooting warfare - to
them it's peace.
How much more time do you think we have before some Congressional Committee
gets interested in learning what must be done besides "remaining strong" and giving
away money? Only a few changes need be made if we are to win, but they must be
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to