Press Release, Message of President Harry S. Truman to the United States House of Representatives

Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 2
HOLD FOR RELEASE HOLD FOR RELEASE HOLD FOR RELEASE May 3, 1945 CONFIDENTIAL : To be held in STRICT CONFIDENCE and no portion, synopsis or intimation to be given out or published until the READING of the President's Message has begun in the House of Representatives. Extreme care must therefore be exercised to avoid premature publication. JONATHAN DANIELS Secretary to the President TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: I return herewith, without my approval, H. J. Res. 106, "To amend section 5 (k) of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, as amended, with respect to the deferment of registrants engaged in agricultural occu- pations or endeavors essential to the war effort." The joint resolution would amend section 5 (k) of the Selective Train- ing and Service Act of 1940, as amended, which provides for the deferment of registrants determined to be necessary to and regularly engaged in an agricultural occupation or endeavor essential to the war effort. The in- dicated purpose of the amendment is to cause the deferment of larger num- bers of registrants engaged in agricultural production. ÑARA In time of war it is the paramount obligation of every citizen to serve his country to the best of his ability. Under our democratic system male citizens are selected for service in the armed forces pursuant to an Act of Congress which prescribes a fair and impartial method of selection. It is the essence of that act, the Selective Service and Training Act of 1940, that no one shall be placed in a favored position, and thus safe- guarded from the hazards of war, because of his economic, occupational or other status. The sole test under the law is whether the individual can better serve his country in the armed forces or in an essential activity in support of the war effort. The Congress, when it passed the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, wisely provided that no deferment from service in the armed forces should be made in the case of any individual "except upon the basis of the status of such individual, and no such deferment shall be made of individuals by occupational groups This provision is the foundation stone of our selective service system under which over 10 million men have been selected for the colors to make the greatest military force in the h istory of this nation. I do not believe that it was the real intent of Congress that agri- cultural workers should be given blanket deferment as a group, or that Congress intended to enact legislation formulating the national policy that agricultural employment was more essential than any other type of e imployment, including service in the armed forces of the United States in the protection of our country. Nevertheless, the legislation now passed by the Congress and presented for my approval would appear to have that result and to constitute a departure from the sound principle hereinbefore stated on which we have erected our military manpower mobilization system. It would apparently provide that, in determining an individual deferment, the relative essentiality of the agricultural occupation cannot be gauged against an industrial occupation or against military service itself. Thus in practical effect it would single out one special class of our citizens, the agricultural group, and put it on a plane above both industrial occupa- tion and military service. Enactment of such a law would not only be an injustice to the millions already inducted into our armed forces and those yet to be inducted. It would do violence to the basic principle embodied in Section 5 (e) (1) of the Selective Training and Service Act which prohibits deferment by occu- pational groups or groups of individuals, a principle which was incorporated into the present law because of the deferment scandals of the last war, particularly in shipyards. The resolution would also limit. the authority now vested in the President by Section 5 (1) to make final determination of all questions of exemption or deferment under the Act, and would deprive him