Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
284840274
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3#1275
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
AUGUST 6, 1947
322
MEMORANDUM OF DISAPPROVAL
I am withholding. my approval of S. 526, the National
Science Foundation Bill.
I take this action with deep regret. On several occa-
sions, I have urged the, Congress to enact legislation to establish
a National Science Foundation. Our national security and welfare
require that we give direct support to basic scientific research
and take steps to increase the number of trained scientists. I
had hoped earnestly that the Congress would enact a bill to
establish a suitable agency to stimulate and correlate the activi-
ties of the Government directed toward these ends.
However, this bill contains provisions which represent
such a marked departure from sound principles for the administration
of public affairs that I cannot give it my approval. It would, in
effect, vest the determination of vital national policies, the
expenditure of large public funds, and the administration of important
governmental functions in a group of individuals who would be essen-
tially private citizens. The proposed National Science Foundation
would be divorced from control by the people to an extent that implies
a distinct lack of faith in democratic processes.
NARA
Moreover, the organization prescribed .in the bill is so
complex and unwieldy that there is grave danger that it would impede
rather than promote the Government's efforts to encourage scientific
research. The Government's expenditures for scientific research
and development activities currently amount to hundreds of millions
of dollars a year. Under present world conditions, this work is
vital to our national welfare and security. We cannot afford to
jeopardize it by imposing upon it an organization so likely to prove
unworkable.
Under S. 526, the powers of the proposed Foundation would
be vested in 24 members, appointed by the President by and with the
advice and consent of the Senate. These members would be part time
officials, required to meet only once each year. This group would,
in turn, select biennially from among its 24 members an executive
committee of 9 members and would exercise its powers through the
executive committee. This 9 member executive committe would also
be a part time body required to meet only six times a year.
The Foundation would have a chief executive officer, known
as the Director. He would be appointed by the 9 member executive
committee unless the 24 member body itself chose to appoint him.
The power and duties of the Director would be prescribed by the
executive committee and exercised under its supervision.
There would be within the Foundation a number of divisions,
each exercising such duties and performing such functions as the
Foundation prescribed. There would be no limit upon the number of
divisions which the Foundation could establish. For each division
there would be a divisional committee. In the case of the Committee
for the Division of National Defense, there would be a limit of 36
members, half of whom would be appointed by the Foundation and half
of whom would be representatives of the armed services. In other
cases, there would be no limit upon the number of members of each
divisional committee and all of the members would be appointed by
the Foundation. Not only would these part time committees furnish
advice and make recommendations concerning the Government's scientific
research program, but each divisional committee would also "exercise
and perform the powers and duties of its division".
The Foundation would also be empowered to appoint commis-
sions in various fields of research. Three such commissions are
specified in the bill, and the Foundation could appoint as many
additional special commissions as it saw fit. Each such commission
would consist of 6 eminent scientists and 5 members from the general
public. After making a survey of public and private research already
(OVER)
Relations
belongs_to