Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
284841567
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 21711
317
HOLD FOR RELEASE
HOLD FOR RELEASE
HOLD FOR RELEASE
JULY 3, 1948
CONFIDENTIAL: The following Statement by the President MUST BE HELD
IN STRICT CONFIDENCE and no portion, synopsis or intimation may be
given out or published UNTIL RELEASED.
NOTE:
Release is automatic at 6:00 P. M., E.D.T., today,
Saturday, July 3, 1948. The same release applies to all newspapers,
radio commentators and news broadcasters.
PLEASE EXERCISE THE UTMOST CARE TO PREVENT PREMATURE
PUBLICATION OR RADIO ANNOUNCEMENT.
EBEN A. AYERS
Assistant Press Secretary
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
I have today signed the Postal Rate Revision and Federal
Employee Salary Act of 1948 (H. R. 6916).
I have done so even though the Act meets neither the needs
of the employees nor those of the Government
NARA
In my Budget Message in January, I stated that the best
approach to the cost-of-living problem faced by Federal employees
was to enact a comprehensive program to hold living costs down. This
would not only have aided Federal workers but would also have given
relief to our people generally. But the Congress did not enact such
a program, and prices have continued to rise.
Since the Congress failed to take action to hold down the
cost of living, it is only fair that Federal employees should be
given pay increases to offset in some degree the constantly rising
cost of living.
It is unfortunate, however, that the Congress, in attempting
to grant relief, has acted in such a manner as to aggravate an already
serious situation.
The Act grants a flat increase to employees covered by the
Classification Act. Differences between the upper and lower pay grades,
already substantially reduced by the pay raises given in 1945 and 1946,
are further decreased by this Act. The effect of this is to reduce
seriously the opportunity for salary advancement which should go with
increased responsibility.
For example, young chemists who have just received their
undergraduate degrees will receive, under this Act, $2974.80 a year
for working in Government laboratories. Working alongside of these
recent graduates will be some of the Nation's outstanding scientists
who, after twenty or twenty-five years of service, will be receiving
only $10,330.00 as the heads of these laboratories.
Another fundamental defect in the Act is that when this law
becomes effective the members of many of our boards and commissions and
some heads of agencies will be `receiving $10,000 while groups of their
employees will be compensated at the rate of $10,330. In other words,
those who are ultimately held responsible for what happens in these
agencies will be getting less money than some of the persons employed
by them.
This is, of course, a violation of the principles of sound
management. I know of no other way to characterize it than to say that
it is ridiculous. Certainly nowhere else could one find a situation
comparable to it in either public or private employment.
No successful industrial concern would tolerate a situation
which provided as narrow a spread between entrance salaries and the
(OVER)
Relations
belongs_to