Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 7
75 Of Office of theAttorney General 1 CUSTOMER JUN 17 1952 Honorable Frederick J. Lawton Director, Bureau of the Budget Washington, D. C. My dear Mr. Lawton: In compliance with Mr. Jones' request of June 11, 1952, I have had examined a facsimile of the enrolled bill (H.R. 5678) "To revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality; and for other purposes. The bill would codify and to some extent revise existing laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality. While numerous criticisms have been advanced concerning the measure, such criticisms to a considerable extent have been directed at the failure of the measure to effect basic changes in existing law. It is assumed that a.s far as existing law is con- cerned, the criticisms, valid or otherwise, should not affect the question of whether approval should be given the measure since disapproval would have no effect on existing law. In so far as it codifies existing law, the bill unques- tionably is desirable and includes a number of provisions which are generally regarded as improvements over existing law. Among such provisions are those which would eliminate existing racial bars to immigration and naturalization and the provisions which would eliminate existing sex discriminations. It must be conceded that the bill does contain some pro- ns that might well be considered as objectionable. It is the ew of this Department, however, that the objections to these pro- 3 fisions are not of such weight as would justify withholding approval the measure which, as a whole, is believed to be an improvement upon existing law. Accordingly, the Department of Justice finds no objection the approval of the bill. TRUMAN BATIONAL AND Sincerely, ESCHIVES RECORDS SERVICE so Jones I'm General Attorney